da Silva Jenevaldo Barbosa, André Marcos Rogério, Machado Rosangela Zacarias
Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016 Feb;7(1):20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Major surface protein 1a has been used as a marker for genetic stability in identifying geographical isolates of Anaplasma marginale. We conducted a longitudinal study to ascertain the genetic diversity of A. marginale in a dairy cattle herd with a history of clinical anaplasmosis. A total of 20 calves were evaluated every 3 months, from birth to 1 year of age. They were evaluated using blood smears, IFAT, ELISA, and qPCR. Additionally, samples positive for the msp1a gene using nPCR were sequenced. The detection of A. marginale ranged from 20 to 90% using blood smears, 20-80% using ELISA/IFAT, and 15-100% using qPCR. We found evidence that suggested transplacental transmission of A. marginale in 15% (3/20) of the calves based on qPCR and 20% (4/20) based on blood smears. Additionally, these four animals were A. marginale ELISA/IFAT-positive. The A. marginale strains found were α-β(3)-Γ (n=7), α-β(2) (n=1), and α-β(2)-190-Γ (n=1). The new MSP1a tandem repeat 190 was described. The results showed that the genetic diversity of A. marginale in a group of calves up to 1 year of age from Taiaçu (SP) was low, with only three different strains identified, showing the microsatellite genotype E. Eighty percent of the animals evaluated had clinical signs of bovine anaplasmosis and were treated using oxytetracycline and imidocarb dipropionate. Additionally, it was found that 30% (6/20) and 10% (2/20) of the animals required a second and third treatment, respectively, based on clinical signs. Four animals infected with the α-β(3)-Γ strain died, showing that this strain is also involved in the clinical anaplasmosis cases in Brazil.
主要表面蛋白1a已被用作鉴别边缘无形体地理分离株遗传稳定性的标志物。我们开展了一项纵向研究,以确定一个有临床无形体病病史的奶牛群中边缘无形体的遗传多样性。从出生到1岁,每3个月对总共20头犊牛进行评估。使用血涂片、间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)对它们进行评估。此外,对使用巢式PCR检测msp1a基因呈阳性的样本进行测序。使用血涂片检测边缘无形体的阳性率为20%至90%,使用ELISA/IFAT为20% - 80%,使用qPCR为15% - 100%。基于qPCR,我们发现有证据表明15%(3/20)的犊牛存在边缘无形体的经胎盘传播;基于血涂片,这一比例为20%(4/20)。此外,这四只动物的ELISA/IFAT检测呈边缘无形体阳性。发现的边缘无形体菌株为α-β(3)-Γ(n = 7)、α-β(2)(n = 1)和α-β(2)-190-Γ(n = 1)。描述了新的MSP1a串联重复序列190。结果表明,来自塔亚苏(圣保罗州)的一组1岁以下犊牛中边缘无形体的遗传多样性较低,仅鉴定出三种不同菌株,显示为微卫星基因型E。80%接受评估的动物有牛无形体病的临床症状,并使用土霉素和双丙酸咪唑苯脲进行治疗。此外,基于临床症状,发现分别有30%(6/20)和10%(2/20)的动物需要进行第二次和第三次治疗。四只感染α-β(3)-Γ菌株的动物死亡,表明该菌株也与巴西的临床无形体病病例有关。