Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌四种放疗方式的泌尿生殖系统和胃肠道毒性比较:常规放疗、调强放疗以及有或无外照射放疗的永久性碘-125植入术。

Comparison of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity among four radiotherapy modalities for prostate cancer: Conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and permanent iodine-125 implantation with or without external beam radiotherapy.

作者信息

Sutani Shinya, Ohashi Toshio, Sakayori Masanori, Kaneda Tomoya, Yamashita Shoji, Momma Tetsuo, Hanada Takashi, Shiraishi Yutaka, Fukada Junichi, Oya Mototsugu, Shigematsu Naoyuki

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan; Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2015 Nov;117(2):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity following different prostate cancer treatment modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 1084 consecutive prostate cancer patients treated with conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), permanent iodine-125 implantation (PI) alone, and PI combined with external beam radiotherapy (PI+EBRT). The effects of treatment- and patient-related factors on late grade ⩾ 2 (G2+) GU/GI toxicity risk were assessed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 43 months (range, 12-97 months). Compared to the PI+EBRT, there was significantly less G2+ GU toxicity in the conventional radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.77) and the IMRT (HR=0.45, 95% CI, 0.27-0.73). Compared to the PI+EBRT, there was significantly more G2+ GI toxicity in the IMRT (HR = 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-4.87). In PI-related groups, prostate equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions was a significant predictor of G2+ GU toxicity (p = 0.001), and the rectal volume receiving more than 100% of the prescribed dose was a significant predictor of G2+ GI toxicity (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The differences in the late G2+ GU/GI risk cannot be explained by the differences in treatment modalities themselves, but by the total radiation dose to the GU/GI tract, which had a causal role in the development of late G2+ GU/GI toxicity across all treatment modality groups.

摘要

目的

比较不同前列腺癌治疗方式后的晚期泌尿生殖系统(GU)和胃肠道(GI)毒性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了1084例连续接受常规放疗、调强放疗(IMRT)、单纯永久性碘-125植入(PI)以及PI联合外照射放疗(PI+EBRT)的前列腺癌患者。评估了治疗相关因素和患者相关因素对晚期≥2级(G2+)GU/GI毒性风险的影响。

结果

中位随访时间为43个月(范围12 - 97个月)。与PI+EBRT相比,常规放疗(风险比[HR]=0.39;95%可信区间[CI],0.20 - 0.77)和IMRT(HR = 0.45,95% CI,0.27 - 0.73)中G2+ GU毒性明显更低。与PI+EBRT相比,IMRT中G2+ GI毒性明显更高(HR = 2.38;95% CI,1.16 - 4.87)。在PI相关组中,2 Gy分割剂量下的前列腺等效剂量是G2+ GU毒性的显著预测因素(p = 0.001),接受超过处方剂量100%的直肠体积是G2+ GI毒性的显著预测因素(p = 0.001)。

结论

晚期G2+ GU/GI风险的差异不能用治疗方式本身的差异来解释,而应由GU/GI道的总辐射剂量来解释,这在所有治疗方式组的晚期G2+ GU/GI毒性发生中起因果作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验