Shah Gulzar H, Luo Huabin, Winterbauer Nancy, Madamala Kusuma
Associate Dean of Research, Associate Professor of Health Policy and Management, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, USA
Assistant Professor, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Perspect Public Health. 2016 Mar;136(2):86-92. doi: 10.1177/1757913915597960. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
(1) To assess the extent to which local health departments (LHDs) implement and evaluate strategies to target the behavioural healthcare needs for the underserved populations and (2) to identify factors that are associated with these undertakings.
Data for this study were drawn from the 2013 National Profile of Local Health Departments Study conducted by National Association of County and City Health Officials. A total of 505 LHDs completed the Module 2 questionnaire of the Profile Study, in which LHDs were asked whether they implemented strategies and evaluated strategies to target the behavioural healthcare needs of the underserved populations. To assess LHDs' level of engagement in assuring access to behavioural healthcare services, descriptive statistics were computed, whereas the factors associated with assuring access to these services were examined by using logistic regression analyses. To account for complex survey design, we used SVY routine in Stata 11.
Only about 24.9% of LHDs in small jurisdiction (<50,000 population) and 35.3% of LHDs in medium-size jurisdiction implemented/evaluated strategies to target the behavioural healthcare services needs of underserved populations in their jurisdiction in 2013. Logistic regression model results showed that LHDs having city/multicity jurisdiction (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = .16, 95% confidence interval (CI): .04-.77), centralised governance (AOR = .12, 95% CI: .02-.85), and those located in South Region (AOR = .25, 95% CI: .08-.74) or the West Region (AOR = .36, 95% CI: 14-.94), were less likely to have implemented/evaluated strategies to target the behavioural healthcare needs of the underserved.
The extent to which the LHDs implemented or evaluated strategies to target the behavioural healthcare needs of the underserved population varied by geographic regions and jurisdiction types. Different community needs or different state Medicaid programmes may have accounted for these variations. LHDs could play an important role in improving equity in access to care, including behavioural healthcare services in the communities.
(1)评估地方卫生部门(LHDs)实施和评估针对服务不足人群行为健康护理需求的策略的程度;(2)确定与这些工作相关的因素。
本研究的数据取自全国县市卫生官员协会开展的2013年地方卫生部门全国概况研究。共有505个地方卫生部门完成了概况研究的模块2问卷,其中询问了地方卫生部门是否实施和评估了针对服务不足人群行为健康护理需求的策略。为评估地方卫生部门在确保获得行为健康护理服务方面的参与程度,计算了描述性统计数据,而通过逻辑回归分析来研究与确保获得这些服务相关的因素。为考虑复杂的调查设计,我们在Stata 11中使用了SVY程序。
2013年,在小型辖区(人口<50,000)中,只有约24.9%的地方卫生部门实施/评估了针对辖区内服务不足人群行为健康护理服务需求的策略,在中型辖区中这一比例为35.3%。逻辑回归模型结果显示,具有城市/多城市辖区的地方卫生部门(调整后的优势比(AOR)=0.16,95%置信区间(CI):0.04 - 0.77)、实行集中治理的地方卫生部门(AOR = 0.12,95% CI:0.02 - 0.85),以及位于南部地区(AOR = 0.25,95% CI:0.08 - 0.74)或西部地区(AOR = 0.36,95% CI:0.14 - 0.94)的地方卫生部门,实施/评估针对服务不足人群行为健康护理需求策略的可能性较小。
地方卫生部门实施或评估针对服务不足人群行为健康护理需求策略的程度因地理区域和辖区类型而异。不同的社区需求或不同的州医疗补助计划可能是造成这些差异的原因。地方卫生部门在改善包括社区行为健康护理服务在内的医疗服务可及性公平性方面可发挥重要作用。