Gu Ning, Ru Tong, Wang Zhiqun, Dai Yimin, Zheng Mingming, Xu Biyun, Hu Yali
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Biostatistics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(8):e0136856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136856. eCollection 2015.
This study aimed to determine the optimal Foley catheter balloon volume (30-mL vs. 80-mL) and the maximum time for cervical ripening (12 hours vs. 24 hours) to improve vaginal delivery rate within 24 hours of induction.
We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial in a teaching hospital in China. Women with a term singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, intact membrane and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <6) were randomly allocated, in 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive either one of the four treatments: (1) 30-mL balloon for a maximum of 12 hours, (2) 30-mL balloon for a maximum of 24 hours, (3) 80-mL balloon for a maximum of 12 hours, and (4) 80-mL balloon for a maximum of 24 hours. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included cesarean section rate and maternal/neonatal morbidity. Data were analyzed on a per-protocol basis.
Five hundred and four women were recruited and randomized (126 women in each group); nine women did not receive the assigned intervention. More women achieved vaginal delivery within 24 hours in 12-hour Foley catheter groups than in the 24-hour Foley catheter groups (30-mL/12 hours: 54.5%, 30-mL/24 hours: 33.1%, 80-mL/12 hours: 46.4%, 80-mL/24 hours: 24.0%, p < 0.001). Cesarean section rates and the incidence of chorioaminonitis were comparable among four groups. After adjustment for confounding factors, both ripening time and balloon size did not affect the proportion of women delivered vaginally within 24 hours of induction.
For women with an unfavorable cervix at term, induction of labor with a Foley catheter is safe and effective. Higher balloon volume (80-mL vs. 30-mL) and longer ripening time (24 hours vs. 12 hours) would not shorten induction to delivery interval or reduce cesarean section rate.
Chinese Clinical trial registry (ChiCTR-TRC-13003044).
本研究旨在确定最佳的弗利导尿管球囊容量(30毫升与80毫升)以及宫颈成熟的最长时间(12小时与24小时),以提高引产24小时内的阴道分娩率。
我们在中国一家教学医院进行了一项开放标签的随机对照试验。足月单胎妊娠、头先露、胎膜完整且宫颈条件不佳( Bishop评分<6)的女性按1:1:1:1的比例随机分配,接受以下四种治疗之一:(1)30毫升球囊最多放置12小时;(2)30毫升球囊最多放置24小时;(3)80毫升球囊最多放置12小时;(4)80毫升球囊最多放置24小时。主要结局是24小时内的阴道分娩。次要结局包括剖宫产率和母婴发病率。数据按符合方案分析。
共招募并随机分配了504名女性(每组126名);9名女性未接受指定干预。12小时弗利导尿管组在24小时内实现阴道分娩的女性比24小时弗利导尿管组更多(30毫升/12小时:54.5%,30毫升/24小时:33.1%,80毫升/12小时:46.4%,80毫升/24小时:24.0%,p<0.001)。四组间剖宫产率和绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率相当。在调整混杂因素后,成熟时间和球囊大小均未影响引产24小时内阴道分娩女性的比例。
对于足月宫颈条件不佳的女性,使用弗利导尿管引产是安全有效的。更高的球囊容量(80毫升与30毫升)和更长的成熟时间(24小时与12小时)不会缩短引产至分娩间隔或降低剖宫产率。
中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR-TRC-13003044)