Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
作者信息
Delitto Anthony, Piva Sara R, Moore Charity G, Welch William C
出版信息
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):397-8. doi: 10.7326/L15-5129-4.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):397-8. doi: 10.7326/L15-5129-4.
2
Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):397. doi: 10.7326/L15-5129-3.
3
Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):396-7. doi: 10.7326/L15-5129-2.
4
Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):396. doi: 10.7326/L15-5129.
5
No differences between physiotherapy and decompression surgery for patients considered surgical candidates for lumbar spinal stenosis [commentary].对于被视为腰椎管狭窄症手术候选者的患者，物理治疗和减压手术之间没有差异[评论]。
J Physiother. 2016 Jan;62(1):49. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
No differences between physiotherapy and decompression surgery for patients considered surgical candidates for lumbar spinal stenosis [synopsis].对于被视为腰椎管狭窄症手术候选者的患者，物理治疗和减压手术之间无差异[综述]。
J Physiother. 2016 Jan;62(1):49. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Physical therapy is as effective as surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, study finds.研究发现，物理治疗对腰椎管狭窄症的效果与手术相当。
BMJ. 2015 Apr 6;350:h1827. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1827.
8
Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: informed patient preferences should weigh heavily.腰椎管狭窄症手术：应高度重视患者的知情偏好。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):518-9. doi: 10.7326/M15-0360.
9
Treating spinal stenosis: physical therapy versus surgery.治疗椎管狭窄：物理治疗与手术治疗对比
Health After 50 Sci Am Consum Health. 2015 Aug;27(7):3.
10
Surgery and physical therapy likely yield similar outcomes in spinal stenosis.手术和物理治疗在治疗椎管狭窄方面可能会产生相似的效果。
Evid Based Med. 2016 Feb;21(1):31. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2015-110220. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
引用本文的文献
1
Targeting skeletal interoception: a novel mechanistic insight into intervertebral disc degeneration and pain management.靶向骨骼内感受：对椎间盘退变和疼痛管理的一种新的机制性见解。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 12;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05577-7.
2
Exploring and analyzing two aging related genes FPR1 and UCHL1 and their potential molecular mechanisms in aggravating lumbar disc herniation.探索和分析两个与衰老相关的基因FPR1和UCHL1及其在加重腰椎间盘突出症中的潜在分子机制。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05257-y.
3
Emerging Issues Questioning the Current Treatment Strategies for Lumbar Disc Herniation.质疑腰椎间盘突出症当前治疗策略的新问题
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 28;9:814531. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.814531. eCollection 2022.
4
Long-Term Follow-Up of Spinal Stenosis Inpatients Treated with Integrative Korean Medicine Treatment.接受韩医综合治疗的腰椎管狭窄症住院患者的长期随访
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 28;10(1):74. doi: 10.3390/jcm10010074.
5
Decompression Surgery versus Interspinous Devices for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.减压手术与棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症：文献系统综述
Asian Spine J. 2020 Aug;14(4):526-542. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0105. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study.老年人群腰椎管狭窄症手术与非手术治疗的效果比较及预后影响因素的观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e024949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024949.
7
Exercise therapy versus surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.运动疗法与手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jul-Aug;34(4):879-885. doi: 10.12669/pjms.344.14349.
本文引用的文献
1
Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):794-810. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136.
2
Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗？一项随机对照试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 1;32(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d.
Zotero 插件