Suppr超能文献

补贴食品商品对美国成年人总能量摄入的贡献。

The contribution of subsidized food commodities to total energy intake among US adults.

作者信息

Siegel Karen R, McKeever Bullard Kai, Ali Mohammed K, Stein Aryeh D, Kahn Henry S, Mehta Neil K, Webb Girard Amy, Narayan K M, Imperatore Giuseppina

机构信息

1Division of Diabetes Translation,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,4770 Buford Highway,Atlanta,GA 30341,USA.

2Hubert Department of Global Health,Emory University,Atlanta,GA,USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun;19(8):1348-57. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002414. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The contribution of subsidized food commodities to total food consumption is unknown. We estimated the proportion of individual energy intake from food commodities receiving the largest subsidies from 1995 to 2010 (corn, soyabeans, wheat, rice, sorghum, dairy and livestock).

DESIGN

Integrating information from three federal databases (MyPyramid Equivalents, Food Intakes Converted to Retail Commodities, and What We Eat in America) with data from the 2001-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, we computed a Subsidy Score representing the percentage of total energy intake from subsidized commodities. We examined the score's distribution and the probability of having a 'high' (≥70th percentile) v. 'low' (≤30th percentile) score, across the population and subgroups, using multivariate logistic regression.

SETTING

Community-dwelling adults in the USA.

SUBJECTS

Participants (n 11 811) aged 18-64 years.

RESULTS

Median Subsidy Score was 56·7 % (interquartile range 47·2-65·4 %). Younger, less educated, poorer, and Mexican Americans had higher scores. After controlling for covariates, age, education and income remained independently associated with the score: compared with individuals aged 55-64 years, individuals aged 18-24 years had a 50 % higher probability of having a high score (P<0·0001). Individuals reporting less than high-school education had 21 % higher probability of having a high score than individuals reporting college completion or higher (P=0·003); individuals in the lowest tertile of income had an 11 % higher probability of having a high score compared with individuals in the highest tertile (P=0·02).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 50 % of energy in US diets is derived from federally subsidized commodities.

摘要

目的

补贴食品商品对总食物消费的贡献尚不清楚。我们估计了1995年至2010年期间从获得最大补贴的食品商品(玉米、大豆、小麦、大米、高粱、乳制品和牲畜)中获取的个体能量摄入量的比例。

设计

将来自三个联邦数据库(我的金字塔等量物、转换为零售商品的食物摄入量以及美国国民饮食调查)的信息与2001 - 2006年国家健康和营养检查调查的数据相结合,我们计算了一个补贴分数,该分数代表补贴商品中总能量摄入量的百分比。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析了该分数在总体人群和亚组中的分布情况,以及获得“高”(≥第70百分位数)与“低”(≤第30百分位数)分数的概率。

背景

美国社区居住的成年人。

研究对象

18 - 64岁的参与者(n = 11811)。

结果

补贴分数中位数为56.7%(四分位间距47.2 - 65.4%)。年轻人、受教育程度较低者、贫困者以及墨西哥裔美国人的分数较高。在控制协变量后,年龄、教育程度和收入仍与分数独立相关:与55 - 64岁的个体相比,18 - 24岁的个体获得高分的概率高50%(P<0.0001)。报告高中以下教育程度的个体获得高分的概率比报告大学毕业或更高学历的个体高21%(P = 0.003);收入处于最低三分位数的个体与最高三分位数的个体相比,获得高分的概率高11%(P = 0.02)。

结论

美国饮食中超过50%的能量来自联邦补贴商品。

相似文献

1
The contribution of subsidized food commodities to total energy intake among US adults.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun;19(8):1348-57. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002414. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
5
Assessing the Public's Comprehension of Dietary Guidelines: Use of MyPyramid or MyPlate Is Associated with Healthier Diets among US Adults.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Mar;119(3):482-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
7
Beverage intake among preschool children and its effect on weight status.
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):e1010-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2348.
8
Trends in Food Sources and Diet Quality Among US Children and Adults, 2003-2018.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5262.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):e28-e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
2
The association between dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Jun;27(3):251-60. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12139. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
3
The essential role of food and farm policy in improving health.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1519-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0857.
5
Agricultural subsidies and the American obesity epidemic.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.010.
6
The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors.
JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):591-608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.13805.
7
Can nutrition be promoted through agriculture-led food price policies? A systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 25;3(6):e002937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002937.
8
Secular changes in the age-specific prevalence of diabetes among U.S. adults: 1988-2010.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2690-6. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2074. Epub 2013 May 1.
9
Food pricing strategies, population diets, and non-communicable disease: a systematic review of simulation studies.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001353. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
10
Agriculture Policy Is Health Policy.
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2009 Jul;4(3-4):393-408. doi: 10.1080/19320240903321367. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验