Allegaert Karel, Cossey Veerle, van den Anker John N
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Division of Woman and Child, University Hospital, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(39):5699-704. doi: 10.2174/1381612821666150901110659.
Once daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been introduced and validated in non-neonatal patient cohorts. This is because aminoglycosides display peak concentration dependent bacterial killing, have a postantibiotic effect and adaptive resistance. In addition, this strategy reduces toxicity. Although aminoglycosides are also frequently administered to neonates, there is still debate about how to integrate and extrapolate these extended interval dosing regimens into dosing schedules tailored for neonates. There is a growing body of knowledge on aminoglycoside disposition and its covariates (e.g. asphyxia, ibuprofen or indomethacin exposure, serum creatinine, sepsis, dose accuracy) in neonates. In essence, integration of developmental physiology with clinical pharmacology unveils a discrepancy between aspects related to either body composition (higher distribution volume necessitates higher dose, to attain peak concentration) or to elimination clearance (lower renal clearance necessitates prolonged time interval between administrations). Such discrepancy can be solved by introducing more complex dosing guidelines (based on weight, postnatal age, serum creatinine, ibuprofen, asphyxia) in neonates. However, the introduction of more complex dosing guidelines should be balanced with its clinical feasibility. At least, there are reports that these more complex dosing guidelines result in a higher incidence of dosing errors. Besides errors in prescription, these errors also relate to the number of dilutions or manipulations needed before the prescribed dose can be administered. Since an integrated approach is needed, we discuss in this overview both the available pharmacokinetic data in support of the use of extended dosing regimens in neonates as well as the strategies suggested to reduce dosing errors.
一旦每日一次给药的氨基糖苷类药物在非新生儿患者队列中得到引入和验证。这是因为氨基糖苷类药物表现出浓度依赖性细菌杀伤作用,具有抗生素后效应和适应性耐药。此外,这种给药策略可降低毒性。尽管氨基糖苷类药物也经常用于新生儿,但对于如何将这些延长给药间隔的方案整合并外推到适合新生儿的给药方案中仍存在争议。关于新生儿氨基糖苷类药物的处置及其协变量(如窒息、布洛芬或吲哚美辛暴露、血清肌酐、败血症、剂量准确性)的知识越来越多。从本质上讲,发育生理学与临床药理学的结合揭示了与身体组成(分布容积较大需要更高剂量以达到峰值浓度)或消除清除率(肾清除率较低需要延长给药间隔时间)相关方面之间的差异。这种差异可以通过在新生儿中引入更复杂的给药指南(基于体重、出生后年龄、血清肌酐、布洛芬、窒息情况)来解决。然而,引入更复杂的给药指南应与其临床可行性相平衡。至少,有报告称这些更复杂的给药指南导致给药错误的发生率更高。除了处方错误外,这些错误还与给药前所需的稀释或操作次数有关。由于需要一种综合方法,我们在本综述中既讨论了支持在新生儿中使用延长给药方案的现有药代动力学数据,也讨论了为减少给药错误而建议的策略。