• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大规模伤亡事件模拟中使用 JumpSTART 分诊法的准确性、效率及不当行为

Accuracy, Efficiency, and Inappropriate Actions Using JumpSTART Triage in MCI Simulations.

作者信息

Claudius Ilene, Kaji Amy H, Santillanes Genevieve, Cicero Mark X, Donofrio J Joelle, Gausche-Hill Marianne, Srinivasan Saranya, Chang Todd P

机构信息

1Department of Emergency Medicine,Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California,Los Angeles,CaliforniaUSA.

2Department of Emergency Medicine,Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center,Los Angeles,CaliforniaUSA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):457-60. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005002. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1017/S1049023X15005002
PMID:26323610
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Using the pediatric version of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (JumpSTART) algorithm for the triage of pediatric patients in a mass-casualty incident (MCI) requires assessing the results of each step and determining whether to move to the next appropriate action. Inappropriate application can lead to performance of unnecessary actions or failure to perform necessary actions. Hypothesis/Problem To report overall accuracy and time required for triage, and to assess if the performance of unnecessary steps, or failure to perform required steps, in the triage algorithm was associated with inaccuracy of triage designation or increased time to reach a triage decision.

METHODS

Medical students participated in an MCI drill in which they triaged both live actors portraying patients and computer-based simulated patients to the four triage levels: minor, delayed, immediate, and expectant. Their performance was timed and compared to intended triage designations and a priori determined critical actions.

RESULTS

Thirty-three students completed 363 scenarios. The overall accuracy was 85.7% and overall mean time to assign a triage designation was 70.4 seconds, with decreasing times as triage acuity level decreased. In over one-half of cases, the student omitted at least one action and/or performed at least one action that was not required. Each unnecessary action increased time to triage by a mean of 8.4 seconds and each omitted action increased time to triage by a mean of 5.5 seconds. Discussion Increasing triage level, performance of inappropriate actions, and omission of recommended actions were all associated with increasing time to perform triage.

摘要

引言

在大规模伤亡事件(MCI)中使用儿童简易分诊与快速治疗(JumpSTART)算法对儿科患者进行分诊时,需要评估每个步骤的结果,并确定是否采取下一步适当行动。应用不当可能导致执行不必要的操作或未能执行必要的操作。假设/问题 报告分诊的总体准确性和所需时间,并评估分诊算法中不必要步骤的执行情况或所需步骤的遗漏是否与分诊指定的不准确或做出分诊决定的时间增加有关。

方法

医学生参加了一次MCI演练,他们将扮演患者的现场演员和基于计算机模拟的患者分诊到四个分诊级别:轻伤、延迟治疗、立即治疗和期待治疗。对他们的表现进行计时,并与预期的分诊指定和预先确定的关键行动进行比较。

结果

33名学生完成了363个场景演练。总体准确率为85.7%,做出分诊指定的总体平均时间为70.4秒,随着分诊 acuity 水平的降低,时间逐渐减少。在超过一半的案例中,学生至少遗漏了一项行动和/或执行了至少一项不需要的行动。每项不必要行动使分诊时间平均增加8.4秒,每项遗漏行动使分诊时间平均增加5.5秒。讨论 分诊级别提高、不当行动的执行以及推荐行动的遗漏均与分诊执行时间增加有关

相似文献

1
Accuracy, Efficiency, and Inappropriate Actions Using JumpSTART Triage in MCI Simulations.在大规模伤亡事件模拟中使用 JumpSTART 分诊法的准确性、效率及不当行为
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):457-60. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005002. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
2
Comparison of Computerized Patients versus Live Moulaged Actors for a Mass-casualty Drill.在大规模伤员救治演练中,计算机模拟患者与真人模拟演员的比较。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):438-42. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004963. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
3
Randomized trial comparing two mass casualty triage systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a pediatric simulated mass casualty event.在儿科模拟大规模伤亡事件中比较两种大规模伤亡分诊系统(JumpSTART与SALT)的随机试验。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):417-23. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.882997. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
4
First Responder Accuracy Using SALT during Mass-casualty Incident Simulation.在大规模伤亡事件模拟中使用SALT时急救人员的准确性。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):150-4. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000091. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
5
Comparison of Electronic Versus Manual Mass-Casualty Incident Triage.电子与人工批量伤亡事件分诊的比较
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Jun;33(3):273-278. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1800033X. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
Impact of a Two-step Emergency Department Triage Model with START, then CTAS, on Patient Flow During a Simulated Mass-casualty Incident.在模拟大规模伤亡事件中,采用先START后CTAS的两步急诊科分诊模式对患者流程的影响。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Aug;30(4):390-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004835.
7
A modified simple triage and rapid treatment algorithm from the New York City (USA) Fire Department.美国纽约市消防局的一种改良版简单分诊与快速治疗算法。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Apr;30(2):199-204. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14001447. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Virtual reality and live simulation: a comparison between two simulation tools for assessing mass casualty triage skills.虚拟现实与现场模拟:两种用于评估大规模伤亡分诊技能的模拟工具的比较
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;22(2):121-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000132.
9
Comparing the Accuracy of Three Pediatric Disaster Triage Strategies: A Simulation-Based Investigation.比较三种儿科灾难分诊策略的准确性:一项基于模拟的调查
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016 Apr;10(2):253-60. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2015.171. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
A pilot study examining the speed and accuracy of triage for simulated disaster patients in an emergency department setting: Comparison of a computerized version of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) methods.一项关于急诊科环境中模拟灾难患者分诊速度和准确性的试点研究:加拿大分诊 acuity 量表(CTAS)计算机化版本与简单分诊和快速治疗(START)方法的比较。
CJEM. 2017 Sep;19(5):364-371. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.386. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Crossover design in triage education: the effectiveness of simulated interactive vs. routine training on student nurses' performance in a disaster situation.分诊教育中的交叉设计:模拟互动与常规培训对学生护士在灾难情境中表现的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Nov 5;16(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06596-5.
2
Cost-effectiveness of a video game versus live simulation for disaster training.电子游戏与现场模拟用于灾难培训的成本效益分析。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Sep 3;6(5):268-273. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000497. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparison of prehospital professional accuracy, speed, and interrater reliability of six pediatric triage algorithms.
六种儿科分诊算法的院前专业准确性、速度及评分者间信度比较
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 14;3(1):e12613. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12613. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Promptly reporting of critical laboratory values in pediatrics: A work in progress.及时报告儿科危急检验值:一项正在进行的工作。
World J Clin Pediatr. 2018 Nov 12;7(5):105-110. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v7.i5.105.