Cheng Bin, Cai Xin-Jun, Chen Ling-Ya, Wang Zeng, Weng Lin, Li Qing-Lin
Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang Province; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Research on Chest Tumor (Lung, Esophagus), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Research on Chest Tumor (Lung, Esophagus), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang Province; Department of GCP, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Aug;11 Suppl 1:C84-8. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.163849.
To investigate the predictors and impact of cytotoxic second-line chemotherapy for stage IIIa-IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in China.
Medical records of 132 patients who underwent chemotherapy from January 2008 to December 2010 in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The response of first-line gemcitabine (GEM) and platinum doublets chemotherapy was evaluated, and the overall survival (OS) of all patients was followed. Further, risk factors of receipt cytotoxic second-line chemotherapy or not were identified and evaluated by univariate analyses.
Sixty-six cases have undergone cytotoxic second-line chemotherapy for lung cancer. The OS between patients received first-line GEM plus platinum doublets chemotherapy and patients without cytotoxic second chemotherapy had no statistical difference (P = 0.73). Smoking or not might be a meaningful predictor for cytotoxic second-line therapy among these patients in this investigation (P < 0.05). Other factors, such as age (≥ 65 or < 65), gender, alcohol use, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, histology type, number of cycles of first-line chemotherapy, and response of first-line chemotherapy had no statistical difference between patients received first-line GEM plus platinum doublets chemotherapy and patients received cytotoxic second chemotherapy (P > 0.05). In the sub-analysis, we found that the OS between patients received first-line GEM plus platinum doublets chemotherapy and patients without cytotoxic second chemotherapy had statistical difference in the population whose OS < 540 days (P = 0.019). Moreover, in these patients, the blood type was found to be a selected factor in receiving cytotoxic second-line chemotherapy or not (P < 0.05). Whereas other factors were not shown their selected effect (P > 0.05).
This study demonstrated that though the essentiality of cytotoxic second-line chemotherapy for stage IIIa-IV EGFR mutation indefinite NSCLC is unclear, patients who are blood type AB with poor prognosis and short OS might be a dominant population for cytotoxic second-line chemotherapy.
探讨中国Ⅲa - Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者细胞毒性二线化疗的预测因素及影响。
回顾性分析2008年1月至2010年12月在我院接受化疗的132例患者的病历。评估一线吉西他滨(GEM)与铂类双联化疗的反应,并随访所有患者的总生存期(OS)。此外,通过单因素分析确定并评估接受细胞毒性二线化疗与否的危险因素。
66例患者接受了肺癌细胞毒性二线化疗。接受一线GEM加铂类双联化疗的患者与未接受细胞毒性二线化疗的患者的总生存期无统计学差异(P = 0.73)。在本研究中,吸烟与否可能是这些患者接受细胞毒性二线治疗的一个有意义的预测因素(P < 0.05)。其他因素,如年龄(≥65岁或<65岁)、性别、饮酒、高血压、糖尿病、组织学类型、一线化疗周期数以及一线化疗反应,在接受一线GEM加铂类双联化疗的患者与接受细胞毒性二线化疗的患者之间无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。在亚组分析中,我们发现总生存期<540天的人群中,接受一线GEM加铂类双联化疗的患者与未接受细胞毒性二线化疗的患者的总生存期有统计学差异(P = 0.019)。此外,在这些患者中,血型被发现是接受细胞毒性二线化疗与否的一个选择因素(P < 0.05)。而其他因素未显示出其选择作用(P > 0.05)。
本研究表明,虽然Ⅲa - Ⅳ期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变不明确型非小细胞肺癌细胞毒性二线化疗的必要性尚不清楚,但预后差、总生存期短的AB血型患者可能是细胞毒性二线化疗的主要人群。