Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine 164 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, Republic of Korea.
Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine 164 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, Republic of Korea.
Lung Cancer. 2015 Feb;87(2):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
Despite advances in palliative chemotherapy, patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) eventually experience disease progression during or after completion of first-line chemotherapy, which requires salvage therapy. Second- or third-line therapy in selected patients is recommended in the current guidelines. Although fourth-line therapy is often performed in daily practice in some countries, there are few reports about the clinical benefits of fourth-line therapy.
A retrospective review was conducted on 383 patients who underwent at least first-line palliative chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC (stage IV or stage IIIB/recurrent disease unsuitable for definitive local therapy). Overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed according to the lines of chemotherapy as well as for all study patients.
The median OS for all patients after the initiation of first-line therapy was 11 months. The median OS for patients who received fourth- or further-line therapy (77 patients) was longer than that of patients who received third- or lesser-line therapy (27 versus 9 months, p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, fourth- or further-line therapy was independently associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.57, p<0.0001) along with recurrent disease, female, age <70 years, and ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1. Median OS after the start of fourth-line therapy was 9 months. Good PS (ECOG PS 0, 1) at the initiation of fourth-line therapy (10 versus 2 months, p<0.0001) and disease control (10 versus 7 months, p=0.011) after first-line therapy were associated with favorable OS in univariate analysis, while poor PS (ECOG PS ≥2) was an independent prognostic factor for poor outcome (p<0.0001).
The present study suggests that advanced NSCLC patients with good PS after progression from third-line therapy could be considered as reasonable candidates for fourth-line therapy in clinical practice.
尽管姑息化疗取得了进展,但晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在一线化疗完成期间或之后最终会出现疾病进展,这需要挽救性治疗。目前的指南建议对选定的患者进行二线或三线治疗。尽管在一些国家,四线治疗在日常实践中经常进行,但关于四线治疗的临床获益的报道很少。
对 383 名接受至少一线姑息化疗治疗晚期 NSCLC(IV 期或 IIIB 期/局部治疗不适合的复发性疾病)的患者进行了回顾性审查。根据化疗线数以及所有研究患者分析总生存期(OS)和临床病理特征。
所有患者在开始一线治疗后的中位 OS 为 11 个月。接受四线或更后线治疗(77 例)的患者的中位 OS 长于接受三线或更少线治疗的患者(27 与 9 个月,p<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,四线或更后线治疗与有利的 OS 独立相关(风险比:0.44,95%置信区间:0.34-0.57,p<0.0001),以及复发性疾病、女性、年龄<70 岁和 ECOG 表现状态(PS)0 或 1。四线治疗开始后的中位 OS 为 9 个月。四线治疗开始时良好的 PS(ECOG PS 0、1)(10 与 2 个月,p<0.0001)和一线治疗后疾病控制(10 与 7 个月,p=0.011)与单变量分析中的有利 OS 相关,而较差的 PS(ECOG PS≥2)是不良预后的独立预后因素(p<0.0001)。
本研究表明,三线治疗进展后 PS 良好的晚期 NSCLC 患者可能被认为是临床实践中四线治疗的合理候选者。