• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中的医生自我表露:一项关于全科医生态度、技能和行为的混合方法研究。

Physician self-disclosure in primary care: a mixed methods study of GPs' attitudes, skills, and behaviour.

作者信息

Allen Emily-Charlotte Frances, Arroll Bruce

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Director of the Goodfellow Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;65(638):e601-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686521.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp15X686521
PMID:26324497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4540400/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a debate in medicine about the use and value of self-disclosure by the physician as a communication tool. There is little empirical evidence about GPs and self-disclosure.

AIM

To explore what GPs' attitudes, skills, and behaviour are with regard to self-disclosure during a clinical consultation and whether there is a need for the development of training resources.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Mixed methods using open-ended and semi-structured interviews in Auckland, New Zealand, and the surrounding districts.

METHOD

Sixteen GPs were interviewed on the issue of self-disclosure in clinical practice. A general inductive approach was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Self-disclosure was common in this group of GPs, contrary to training in some of the groups, and was seen as a potentially positive activity. Family and physical topics were most common, yet psychological and relationship issues were also discussed. Knowing patients made self-disclosure more likely, but a GP's intuition played the main role in determining when to self-disclose, and to whom. GPs have developed their own guidelines, shaped by years of experience; however, there was a consensus that training would be helpful.

CONCLUSION

Self-disclosure is common and, in general, seen as positive. Major personal issues were acceptable for some GPs to self-disclose, especially to known patients. Although participants had developed their own guidelines, exposure of trainees to the issue of self-disclosure would be of value to prevent future mistakes and to protect both doctor and patient from any unintended harm, for example, developing a dependent relationship.

摘要

背景

在医学领域,关于医生自我表露作为一种沟通工具的使用和价值存在争议。关于全科医生与自我表露的实证证据很少。

目的

探讨全科医生在临床会诊中对自我表露的态度、技能和行为,以及是否需要开发培训资源。

设计与地点

采用开放式和半结构式访谈的混合方法,在新西兰奥克兰及周边地区进行。

方法

就临床实践中的自我表露问题对16名全科医生进行了访谈。数据分析采用一般归纳法。

结果

与部分群体的培训情况相反,自我表露在这群全科医生中很常见,且被视为一种潜在的积极行为。家庭和身体方面的话题最为常见,但心理和人际关系问题也会被讨论。了解患者会使自我表露更有可能发生,但全科医生的直觉在决定何时以及向谁进行自我表露时起主要作用。全科医生根据多年经验制定了自己的指导原则;然而,大家一致认为培训将有所帮助。

结论

自我表露很常见,总体上被视为积极的。一些全科医生认为可以自我表露重大个人问题,尤其是对熟悉的患者。尽管参与者已经制定了自己的指导原则,但让实习医生接触自我表露问题将有助于防止未来出现错误,并保护医生和患者免受任何意外伤害,例如建立依赖关系。

相似文献

1
Physician self-disclosure in primary care: a mixed methods study of GPs' attitudes, skills, and behaviour.基层医疗中的医生自我表露:一项关于全科医生态度、技能和行为的混合方法研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;65(638):e601-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686521.
2
GPs role identifying young people who self-harm: a mixed methods study.全科医生在识别青少年自我伤害行为中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Fam Pract. 2015 Aug;32(4):415-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv031. Epub 2015 May 8.
3
From silence to sensitivity: a new Identity Disclosure model to facilitate disclosure for same-sex attracted women in general practice consultations.从沉默到敏感:一种新的身份披露模型,以促进一般实践咨询中对同性恋女性的披露。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.037. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
4
GPs' perceptions of resilience training: a qualitative study.全科医生对弹性训练的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Oct;67(663):e709-e715. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692561. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
5
GP views on their role in bullying disclosure by children and young people in the community: a cross-sectional qualitative study in English primary care.全科医生对社区中儿童和青少年欺凌披露角色的看法:英国初级保健中的横断面定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct 31;69(688):e752-e759. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706013. Print 2019 Nov.
6
Diagnosis and disclosure of dementia--a comparative qualitative study of Irish and Swedish General Practitioners.痴呆的诊断与披露——爱尔兰和瑞典全科医生的比较定性研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(1):77-84. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.692763. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
Doctors' attitudes and confidence towards providing nutrition care in practice: Comparison of New Zealand medical students, general practice registrars and general practitioners.医生在实际工作中提供营养护理的态度和信心:新西兰医科学生、全科实习医生和全科医生的比较。
J Prim Health Care. 2015 Sep 1;7(3):244-50.
8
Developing and evaluating a course programme to enhance existential communication with cancer patients in general practice.开发并评估一个课程项目,以加强全科医疗中与癌症患者的存在主义沟通。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Jun;36(2):142-151. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1459235. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
9
General practitioners' 'lived experience' of assessing psychological distress in cancer patients: an exploratory qualitative study.全科医生评估癌症患者心理痛苦的“亲身经历”:一项探索性定性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 May;25(3):391-401. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12351. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Elderly patients' and GPs' perspectives of patient-GP communication concerning polypharmacy: a qualitative interview study.老年患者及全科医生对多药合用情况下医患沟通的看法:一项定性访谈研究
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Jul;19(4):355-364. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000883. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Sharing "off-script": A qualitative analysis of providers' empathic self-disclosures during dignity therapy.分享“脱稿内容”:尊严疗法中提供者共情性自我表露的质性分析
Palliat Support Care. 2025 Feb 6;23:e57. doi: 10.1017/S1478951524002098.
2
The ill physician who self-discloses: What do patients think?自我暴露的患病医生:患者怎么想?
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):244-251. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2146091.
3
Should Physicians Disclose Their Own Health Challenges? Perspectives of Patients With Chronic Pain.医生应该披露自己的健康问题吗?慢性疼痛患者的观点。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Sep 21;9:23743735221128675. doi: 10.1177/23743735221128675. eCollection 2022.
4
The Effect of Robot Attentional Behaviors on User Perceptions and Behaviors in a Simulated Health Care Interaction: Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人注意力行为对模拟医疗保健互动中用户认知和行为的影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 4;21(10):e13667. doi: 10.2196/13667.
5
To self-disclose or not self-disclose? A systematic review of clinical self-disclosure in primary care.是否进行自我披露?对初级保健中临床自我披露的系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;65(638):e609-16. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686533.

本文引用的文献

1
Too much information--the ethics of self-disclosure.信息过多——自我披露的伦理问题。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 3;371(1):8-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1404119.
2
The role of therapist self-disclosure in psychotherapy: a qualitative review.治疗师自我表露在心理治疗中的作用:一项定性综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;30(1):63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.09.004.
3
Physician self-disclosure in primary care visits: enough about you, what about me?基层医疗问诊中的医生自我表露:关于你的情况已经够多了,那我呢?
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jun 25;167(12):1321-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.12.1321.
4
What do physicians tell patients about themselves? A qualitative analysis of physician self-disclosure.医生会向患者透露关于自己的哪些信息?对医生自我披露的定性分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Sep;19(9):911-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30604.x.
5
Is physician self-disclosure related to patient evaluation of office visits?医生的自我表露与患者对门诊就诊的评价有关吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Sep;19(9):905-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40040.x.
6
Therapist self-disclosure: research-based suggestions for practitioners.治疗师的自我表露:给从业者基于研究的建议。
J Clin Psychol. 2003 May;59(5):529-39. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10157.
7
What should physicians tell about themselves to patients?医生应该向患者介绍自己的哪些方面?
Am Fam Physician. 2001 Apr 1;63(7):1440-2.
8
Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study.初级保健中患者对以患者为中心的咨询方式的偏好:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):468-72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.468.
9
Professional boundaries in the physician-patient relationship.医患关系中的专业界限。
JAMA. 1995 May 10;273(18):1445-9.