Tank Jens, Heusser Karsten, Brinkmann Julia, Schmidt Bernhard M, Menne Jan, Bauersachs Johann, Haller Hermann, Diedrich André, Jordan Jens
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 Oct;9(10):794-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
Patients with treatment-resistant arterial hypertension exhibited profound reductions in single sympathetic vasoconstrictor fiber firing rates after renal nerve ablation. In contrast, integrated multi-unit muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) changed little or not at all. We hypothesized that conventional MSNA analysis may have missed single fiber discharges, thus, obscuring sympathetic inhibition after renal denervation. We studied patients with difficult-to-control arterial hypertension (age 45-74 years) before, 6 (n = 11), and 12 months (n = 8) after renal nerve ablation. Electrocardiogram, respiration, brachial, and finger arterial blood pressure (BP), as well as the MSNA and raw MSNA signals were analyzed. We detected MSNA action-potential spikes using 2 stage kurtosis wavelet denoising techniques to assess mean, median, and maximum spike rates for each beat-to-beat interval. Supine heart rate and systolic BP did not change at 6 (ΔHR: -2 ± 3 bpm; ΔSBP: 2 ± 9 mm Hg) or at 12 months (ΔHR: -1 ± 3 mm Hg, ΔSBP: -1 ± 9 mm Hg) after renal nerve ablation. Mean burst frequency and mean spike frequency at baseline were 34 ± 3 bursts per minute and 8 ± 1 spikes per second. Both measurements did not change at 6 months (-1.4 ± 3.6 bursts/minute; -0.6 ± 1.4 spikes/second) or at 12 months (-2.5 ± 4.0 bursts/minute; -2.0 ± 1.6 spikes/second) after renal nerve ablation. After renal nerve ablation, BP decreased in 3 of 11 patients. BP and MSNA spike frequency changes were not correlated (slope = -0.06; P = .369). Spike rate analysis of multi-unit MSNA neurograms further suggests that profound sympathetic inhibition is not a consistent finding after renal nerve ablation.
难治性动脉高血压患者在肾神经消融后,单根交感缩血管纤维放电率显著降低。相比之下,整合的多单位肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)变化很小或根本没有变化。我们推测,传统的MSNA分析可能遗漏了单纤维放电,从而掩盖了肾去神经支配后的交感抑制作用。我们研究了难治性动脉高血压患者(年龄45 - 74岁)在肾神经消融前、消融后6个月(n = 11)和12个月(n = 8)的情况。分析了心电图、呼吸、肱动脉和指动脉血压(BP),以及MSNA和原始MSNA信号。我们使用两阶段峰度小波去噪技术检测MSNA动作电位尖峰,以评估每个逐搏间期的平均、中位数和最大尖峰率。肾神经消融后6个月(ΔHR:-2 ± 3次/分钟;ΔSBP:2 ± 9 mmHg)或12个月(ΔHR:-1 ± 3 mmHg,ΔSBP:-1 ± 9 mmHg)时,仰卧心率和收缩压没有变化。基线时的平均爆发频率和平均尖峰频率分别为每分钟34 ± 3次爆发和每秒8 ± 1次尖峰。肾神经消融后6个月(-1.4 ± 3.6次/分钟;-0.6 ± 每秒1.4次尖峰)或12个月(-2.5 ± 4.0次/分钟;-2.0 ± 每秒1.6次尖峰)时,这两项测量均未改变。肾神经消融后,11例患者中有3例血压下降。血压和MSNA尖峰频率变化无相关性(斜率 = -0.06;P = 0.369)。对多单位MSNA神经图的尖峰率分析进一步表明,肾神经消融后交感抑制作用并非一致的结果。