• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发型多发性硬化症安慰剂组中扩展残疾状态量表进展的变化:一项系统评价与Meta回归分析

Changing EDSS Progression in Placebo Cohorts in Relapsing MS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression.

作者信息

Röver Christian, Nicholas Richard, Straube Sebastian, Friede Tim

机构信息

Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0137052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137052. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0137052
PMID:26327532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4556534/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) revealed a decrease in placebo annualized relapse rates (ARR) over the past two decades. Furthermore, regression to the mean effects were observed in ARR and MRI lesion counts. It is unclear whether disease progression measured by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) exhibits similar features.

METHODS

A systematic review of RCTs in RMS was conducted extracting data on EDSS and baseline characteristics. The logarithmic odds of disease progression were modelled to investigate time trends. Random-effects models were used to account for between-study variability; all investigated models included trial duration as a predictor to correct for unequal study durations. Meta-regressions were conducted to assess the prognostic value of a number of study-level baseline variables.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search identified 39 studies, including a total of 19,714 patients. The proportion of patients in placebo controls experiencing a disease progression decreased over the years (p<0.001). Meta-regression identified associated covariates including the size of the study and its duration that in part explained the time trend. Progression probabilities tended to be lower in the second year of a study compared to the first year with a reduction of 28% in progression odds from year 1 to year 2 (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

EDSS disease progression exhibits similar behaviour over time as the ARR and point to changes in trial characteristics over the years. This needs to be considered in comparisons between historical and recent trials.

摘要

背景

近期对复发型多发性硬化症(RMS)随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价显示,在过去二十年中,安慰剂年化复发率(ARR)有所下降。此外,在ARR和MRI病灶计数中观察到了均值回归效应。尚不清楚通过扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)衡量的疾病进展是否具有类似特征。

方法

对RMS的RCT进行系统评价,提取关于EDSS和基线特征的数据。对疾病进展的对数优势进行建模以研究时间趋势。采用随机效应模型来考虑研究间的变异性;所有研究模型均将试验持续时间作为预测因子,以校正研究持续时间的不平等。进行Meta回归以评估一些研究水平基线变量的预后价值。

结果

系统文献检索确定了39项研究,共纳入19714例患者。安慰剂对照组中经历疾病进展的患者比例多年来有所下降(p<0.001)。Meta回归确定了相关协变量,包括研究规模及其持续时间,这些部分解释了时间趋势。与第一年相比,研究第二年的进展概率往往较低,从第1年到第2年进展优势降低了28%(p = 0.017)。

结论

EDSS疾病进展随时间呈现出与ARR相似的行为,并表明多年来试验特征发生了变化。在历史试验和近期试验的比较中需要考虑这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19e0/4556534/265d701f44e3/pone.0137052.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19e0/4556534/ae147e28991a/pone.0137052.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19e0/4556534/265d701f44e3/pone.0137052.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19e0/4556534/ae147e28991a/pone.0137052.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19e0/4556534/265d701f44e3/pone.0137052.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Changing EDSS Progression in Placebo Cohorts in Relapsing MS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression.复发型多发性硬化症安慰剂组中扩展残疾状态量表进展的变化:一项系统评价与Meta回归分析
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0137052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137052. eCollection 2015.
2
Explaining temporal trends in annualised relapse rates in placebo groups of randomised controlled trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-regression.解释复发型多发性硬化随机对照试验安慰剂组中年度复发率的时间趋势:系统评价和荟萃回归。
Mult Scler. 2013 Oct;19(12):1580-6. doi: 10.1177/1352458513481009. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
3
Time-patterns of annualized relapse rates in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在复发型多发性硬化症的随机安慰剂对照临床试验中,年度复发率的时间模式:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mult Scler. 2012 Sep;18(9):1290-6. doi: 10.1177/1352458511435715. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
4
Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis.米托蒽醌:其在多发性硬化症中的应用综述
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(6):379-96. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418060-00010.
5
Combined MRI lesions and relapses as a surrogate for disability in multiple sclerosis.联合 MRI 病变和复发作为多发性硬化症残疾的替代指标。
Neurology. 2011 Nov 1;77(18):1684-90. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823648b9. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
6
Management of worsening multiple sclerosis with mitoxantrone: a review.米托蒽醌治疗病情进展型多发性硬化症的研究综述
Clin Ther. 2006 Apr;28(4):461-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.013.
7
Annualized relapse rate of first-line treatments for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis, including indirect comparisons versus fingolimod.一线多发性硬化治疗的年复发率:一项荟萃分析,包括与芬戈莫德的间接比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 May;28(5):767-80. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.681637. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
8
Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.β-干扰素与醋酸格拉替雷治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 26(7):CD009333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009333.pub2.
9
Over three decades study populations in progressive multiple sclerosis have become older and more disabled, but have lower on-trial progression rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 randomised placebo-controlled trials.三十多年来,进展性多发性硬化症的研究人群变得更加年老和残疾,但临床试验中的进展率更低:43 项随机安慰剂对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mult Scler. 2019 Oct;25(11):1462-1471. doi: 10.1177/1352458518794063. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Comparative efficacy of disease-modifying therapies for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较缓解复发型多发性硬化症患者疾病修饰疗法的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Sep;9:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Adult and pediatric relapsing multiple sclerosis phase II and phase III trial design and their primary end points: A systematic review.成人和儿科复发型多发性硬化症的 II 期和 III 期临床试验设计及其主要终点:系统评价。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May;17(5):e13794. doi: 10.1111/cts.13794.
2
Immunotherapy for people with clinically isolated syndrome or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: treatment response by demographic, clinical, and biomarker subgroups (PROMISE)-a systematic review protocol.对有临床孤立综合征或复发缓解型多发性硬化症的患者进行免疫治疗:根据人口统计学、临床和生物标志物亚组进行治疗反应的评估(PROMISE)-系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 1;11(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01997-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Utility of the rio score and modified rio score in korean patients with multiple sclerosis.
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0129243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129243. eCollection 2015.
2
Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.来自考克兰系统评价数据库的Meta分析中的发表偏倚。
Stat Med. 2015 Sep 10;34(20):2781-93. doi: 10.1002/sim.6525. Epub 2015 May 18.
3
Regression to the mean and predictors of MRI disease activity in RRMS placebo cohorts--is there a place for baseline-to-treatment studies in MS?复发缓解型多发性硬化症安慰剂队列中向均值回归及MRI疾病活动的预测因素——多发性硬化症中基线至治疗研究是否有一席之地?
COPD mortality and exacerbations in the placebo group of clinical trials over two decades: a systematic review and meta-regression.
二十年来临床试验安慰剂组中的慢性阻塞性肺疾病死亡率和急性加重:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Mar 7;8(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00261-2021. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Changes in the Risk of Reaching Multiple Sclerosis Disability Milestones In Recent Decades: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Sweden.近几十年来多发性硬化症达到残疾里程碑风险的变化:瑞典一项全国范围内基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):665-671. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0330.
5
Pharmacological Approaches to the Management of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.治疗继发进展型多发性硬化的药物干预策略。
Drugs. 2017 May;77(8):885-910. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0726-0.
6
The Efficacy of Natalizumab versus Fingolimod for Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review, Indirect Evidence from Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials and Meta-Analysis of Observational Head-to-Head Trials.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疗效:一项系统评价、随机安慰剂对照试验的间接证据及观察性头对头试验的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163296. eCollection 2016.
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0116559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116559. eCollection 2015.
4
A re-analysis of the Cochrane Library data: the dangers of unobserved heterogeneity in meta-analyses.对考科蓝图书馆数据的重新分析:荟萃分析中未观察到的异质性的危险。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e69930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069930. Print 2013.
5
MRI lesions: a surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis?磁共振成像病变:多发性硬化症复发的替代指标?
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jul;12(7):628-30. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70108-X. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
Explaining temporal trends in annualised relapse rates in placebo groups of randomised controlled trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-regression.解释复发型多发性硬化随机对照试验安慰剂组中年度复发率的时间趋势:系统评价和荟萃回归。
Mult Scler. 2013 Oct;19(12):1580-6. doi: 10.1177/1352458513481009. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
7
Placebo cohorts in phase-3 MS treatment trials - predictors for on-trial disease activity 1990-2010 based on a meta-analysis and individual case data.基于荟萃分析和个体病例数据的 1990-2010 年 MS 治疗三期试验中的安慰剂队列-试验期间疾病活动的预测因子。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050347. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
8
EDSS improvement: recovery of function or noise?扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)的改善:是功能恢复还是假象?
Mult Scler. 2012 Nov;18(11):1520-1. doi: 10.1177/1352458512441689.
9
Scoring treatment response in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.评估复发型多发性硬化症患者的治疗应答。
Mult Scler. 2013 Apr;19(5):605-12. doi: 10.1177/1352458512460605. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
10
Time-patterns of annualized relapse rates in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在复发型多发性硬化症的随机安慰剂对照临床试验中,年度复发率的时间模式:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mult Scler. 2012 Sep;18(9):1290-6. doi: 10.1177/1352458511435715. Epub 2012 Mar 15.