Suppr超能文献

经皮血管内移植物置入术的现状

Current Status of Percutaneous Endografting.

作者信息

Patel Parag J, Kelly Quinton, Hieb Robert A, Lee Cheong Jun

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Sep;32(3):278-88. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556826.

Abstract

Totally percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (PEVAR) using suture-mediated closure devices (SMCDs) has several well-established advantages over standard open femoral exposure as a direct consequence of being less invasive and having shorter times to hemostasis and procedure completion. The first multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of PEVAR and to compare percutaneous access with standard open femoral exposure was recently published (the PEVAR trial). The PEVAR trial demonstrated that percutaneous endografting is safe, effective, and noninferior to standard open femoral exposure among trained operators. The study reaffirmed the results of several recent single center and nonrandomized studies, demonstrating that percutaneous access facilitated shorter procedures, shorter times to secure hemostasis, and improved quality of life for patients. As PEVAR has gained popularity among patients and physicians, refinements to the technique and patient selection process have been made. There has been growing interest in treating patients with anatomical characteristics previously thought to be unsuitable for PEVAR, such as common femoral artery (CFA) calcifications, scarred groins, small CFA diameter, and high patient body mass index (BMI). However, observance of strict procedural technique and consideration for patient selection criteria remain paramount in achieving acceptable technical success rates with PEVAR.

摘要

使用缝线介导闭合装置(SMCD)的完全经皮血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术(PEVAR)相较于标准开放股动脉暴露具有多项公认的优势,这是其侵入性较小、止血时间和手术完成时间较短的直接结果。最近发表了第一项旨在评估PEVAR的安全性和有效性,并将经皮入路与标准开放股动脉暴露进行比较的多中心随机对照试验(PEVAR试验)。PEVAR试验表明,在训练有素的操作者中,经皮血管内植入术是安全、有效的,且不劣于标准开放股动脉暴露。该研究重申了近期几项单中心和非随机研究的结果,表明经皮入路可使手术时间缩短、止血时间缩短,并改善患者的生活质量。随着PEVAR在患者和医生中越来越受欢迎,该技术和患者选择过程也得到了改进。治疗先前被认为不适合PEVAR的解剖学特征患者,如股总动脉(CFA)钙化、腹股沟瘢痕、CFA直径小和患者高体重指数(BMI),受到了越来越多的关注。然而,在通过PEVAR实现可接受的技术成功率方面,严格遵守手术技术和考虑患者选择标准仍然至关重要。

相似文献

1
Current Status of Percutaneous Endografting.经皮血管内移植物置入术的现状
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Sep;32(3):278-88. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556826.

本文引用的文献

9
Current status of percutaneous endografting.经皮腔内血管移植物植入术的现状
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009 Mar;26(1):67-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1208387.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验