Suppr超能文献

医院分娩:我们是否向女性提供了事实?

Hospital birth: are we giving women the facts?

作者信息

Ozkan Ayla

出版信息

Pract Midwife. 2015 Apr;18(4):26-8.

Abstract

An article published last year in the Journal of Medical Ethics compares giving birth at home to being as reckless as driving without putting a seatbelt on your child (de Crespigny and Savulescu 2014). Planning to give birth at home is often thought of as quite an 'alternative' decision, with just 2.4 per cent of women in England and Wales opting for this in 2011 (Office for National Statistics (ONS) 2013). The politics surrounding place of birth in contemporary maternity care are highly contentious and not at all as clear cut as one may initially presume. As a midwife working in a busy UK unit, I would liken the assumption that a low risk birth is inherently safer in a high risk unit to investing in ill-fitting metaphorical seat belts, which may give the whole family whiplash.

摘要

去年发表在《医学伦理学杂志》上的一篇文章将在家分娩比作像不给孩子系安全带开车一样鲁莽(德·克雷斯皮尼和萨夫勒斯库,2014年)。在家分娩的计划通常被认为是一个相当“另类”的决定,2011年在英格兰和威尔士只有2.4%的女性选择这样做(英国国家统计局,2013年)。当代产科护理中关于分娩地点的政治问题极具争议性,远不像人们最初设想的那么明确。作为一名在英国一家繁忙医院工作的助产士,我想把在高危病房进行低风险分娩本质上更安全这种假设比作投资了不合身的隐喻性安全带,这可能会让整个家庭受到冲击。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验