Ozkan Ayla
Pract Midwife. 2015 Apr;18(4):26-8.
An article published last year in the Journal of Medical Ethics compares giving birth at home to being as reckless as driving without putting a seatbelt on your child (de Crespigny and Savulescu 2014). Planning to give birth at home is often thought of as quite an 'alternative' decision, with just 2.4 per cent of women in England and Wales opting for this in 2011 (Office for National Statistics (ONS) 2013). The politics surrounding place of birth in contemporary maternity care are highly contentious and not at all as clear cut as one may initially presume. As a midwife working in a busy UK unit, I would liken the assumption that a low risk birth is inherently safer in a high risk unit to investing in ill-fitting metaphorical seat belts, which may give the whole family whiplash.
去年发表在《医学伦理学杂志》上的一篇文章将在家分娩比作像不给孩子系安全带开车一样鲁莽(德·克雷斯皮尼和萨夫勒斯库,2014年)。在家分娩的计划通常被认为是一个相当“另类”的决定,2011年在英格兰和威尔士只有2.4%的女性选择这样做(英国国家统计局,2013年)。当代产科护理中关于分娩地点的政治问题极具争议性,远不像人们最初设想的那么明确。作为一名在英国一家繁忙医院工作的助产士,我想把在高危病房进行低风险分娩本质上更安全这种假设比作投资了不合身的隐喻性安全带,这可能会让整个家庭受到冲击。