Suppr超能文献

多叶准直器特性和调强放射治疗技术在脑膜瘤及头颈部治疗中的影响

Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.

作者信息

Kantz Steffi, Söhn Matthias, Troeller Almut, Reiner Michael, Weingandt Helmut, Alber Markus, Belka Claus, Ganswindt Ute

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep 2;10:184. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0447-z.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The impact of multileaf collimator (MLC) design and IMRT technique on plan quality and delivery improvements for head-and-neck and meningioma patients is compared in a planning study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten previously treated patients (5 head-and-neck, 5 meningioma) were re-planned for step-and-shoot IMRT (ssIMRT), sliding window IMRT (dMLC) and VMAT using the MLCi2 without (-) and with (+) interdigitation and the Agility-MLC attached to an Elekta 6MV linac. This results in nine plans per patient. Consistent patient individual optimization parameters are used. Plans are generated using the research tool Hyperion V2.4 (equivalent to Elekta Monaco 3.2) with hard constraints for critical structures and objectives for target structures. For VMAT plans, the improved segment shape optimization is used. Critical structures are evaluated based on QUANTEC criteria. PTV coverage is compared by EUD, Dmean, homogeneity and conformity. Additionally, MU/plan, treatment times and number of segments are evaluated.

RESULTS

As constrained optimization is used, all plans fulfill the hard constraints. Doses to critical structures do not differ more than 1 Gy between the nine generated plans for each patient. Only larynx, parotids and eyes differ up to 1.5 Gy (Dmean or Dmax) or 7% (volume-constraint) due to (1) increased scatter, (2) not avoiding structures when using the full range of gantry rotation and (3) improved leaf sequencing with advanced segment shape optimization for VMAT plans. EUD, Dmean, homogeneity and conformity are improved using the Agility-MLC. However, PTV coverage is more affected by technique. MU increase with the use of dMLC and VMAT, while the MU are reduced by using the Agility-MLC. Fastest treatments are always achieved using Agility-MLC, especially in combination with VMAT.

CONCLUSION

Fastest treatments with the best PTV coverage are found for VMAT plans with Agility-MLC, achieving the same sparing of healthy tissue compared to the other combinations of ssIMRT, dMLC and VMAT with either MLCi2(-/+) or Agility.

摘要

目的

在一项计划研究中,比较多叶准直器(MLC)设计和调强放射治疗(IMRT)技术对头颈部及脑膜瘤患者计划质量和治疗实施改进的影响。

材料与方法

对10例既往接受过治疗的患者(5例头颈部患者、5例脑膜瘤患者),使用不带(-)和带(+)指形互锁的MLCi2以及连接到医科达6MV直线加速器的敏捷型MLC,重新进行静态调强放射治疗(ssIMRT)、动态调强放射治疗(dMLC)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)计划设计。这使得每位患者有9种计划。使用一致的患者个体优化参数。使用研究工具Hyperion V2.4(等同于医科达Monaco 3.2)生成计划,对关键结构设置硬约束,对靶区结构设定目标。对于VMAT计划,采用改进的射野形状优化。根据QUANTEC标准评估关键结构。通过等效均匀剂量(EUD)、平均剂量(Dmean)、均匀性和适形度比较计划靶体积(PTV)的覆盖情况。此外,评估每个计划的机器跳数(MU)、治疗时间和射野数。

结果

由于采用了受限优化,所有计划均满足硬约束。对于每位患者生成的9种计划,关键结构所受剂量差异不超过1 Gy。仅喉、腮腺和眼睛所受剂量差异可达1.5 Gy(Dmean或Dmax)或7%(体积约束),原因如下:(1)散射增加;(2)使用龙门架全角度旋转时未避开相关结构;(3)VMAT计划通过改进的射野排序和先进的射野形状优化。使用敏捷型MLC可改善EUD、Dmean、均匀性和适形度。然而,PTV覆盖情况受技术影响更大。使用dMLC和VMAT时MU增加,而使用敏捷型MLC时MU减少。使用敏捷型MLC总能实现最快的治疗,尤其是与VMAT联合使用时。

结论

对于使用敏捷型MLC的VMAT计划,可实现最快的治疗以及最佳的PTV覆盖,与使用MLCi2(-/+)或敏捷型MLC的ssIMRT、dMLC和VMAT的其他组合相比,对健康组织的保护效果相同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f09/4556413/bbb6023192b1/13014_2015_447_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验