• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锥形束计算机断层扫描中头部方向对种植体规划线性测量的影响。

Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

作者信息

Shokri Abbas, Khajeh Samira, Khavid Atefeh, Tabari Sara, Yarmohammadi Shiva

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan Iran.

Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan Iran Phone: +98-9188362065, e-mail:

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Jul 1;16(7):542-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1719.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1719
PMID:26329408
Abstract

AIM

Use of dental implants in edentulous patients has become a common treatment modality. Treatment of such implants requires radiographic evaluation, and in most cases several different imaging techniques are necessary in order to evaluate the height, width and the structure of bone at implant site. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of head orientation in linear measurement for implant planning in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present in vitro study, 11 human dry mandibles were used. The width and height of bone at the central, canine and molar teeth areas were measured on the left and right sides by using digital calipers (as gold standard) and on CBCT images with Reaxis option and no Reaxis. Data were analyzed with Statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) 18, using pair t-test, Tukey test and intraclass correlation (ICC).

RESULTS

Data were collected by evaluation of 11 skulls and 66 samples on the whole. There were no significant differences in bone width in any area in both Reaxis and no Reaxis option (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in bone height in the central (p = 0.005) and molar teeth areas (p = 0.010). The results did not show any significant differences between the observers (p = 0.329).

CONCLUSION

Using the Reaxis option does not affect the measurement of bone width, while use of this option can make a significant difference for height measurements.

摘要

目的

在无牙患者中使用牙种植体已成为一种常见的治疗方式。此类种植体的治疗需要进行影像学评估,并且在大多数情况下,为了评估种植部位的骨高度、宽度和结构,需要几种不同的成像技术。本研究的目的是评估在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中进行种植体规划时头部方位对线性测量的影响。

材料与方法

在本体外研究中,使用了11具人类干燥下颌骨。通过使用数字卡尺(作为金标准)以及在有Reaxis选项和无Reaxis选项的CBCT图像上,测量左右两侧中央、尖牙和磨牙区域的骨宽度和高度。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)18对数据进行分析,采用配对t检验、Tukey检验和组内相关系数(ICC)。

结果

总共通过对11个头骨和66个样本的评估收集数据。在有Reaxis选项和无Reaxis选项的情况下,任何区域的骨宽度均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。中央区域(p = 0.005)和磨牙区域(p = 0.010)的骨高度存在显著差异。结果显示观察者之间没有任何显著差异(p = 0.329)。

结论

使用Reaxis选项不会影响骨宽度的测量,而使用该选项对高度测量可能会产生显著差异。

相似文献

1
Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.锥形束计算机断层扫描中头部方向对种植体规划线性测量的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Jul 1;16(7):542-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1719.
2
In vitro comparison of the effect of different slice thicknesses on the accuracy of linear measurements on cone beam computed tomography images in implant sites.不同层厚对种植部位锥形束计算机断层扫描图像线性测量准确性影响的体外比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jan;26(1):157-60. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001031.
3
Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning.毫安设置对用于种植体规划的锥形束计算机断层扫描成像的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):1364-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3524. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
4
Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning.采用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)测量上颌前牙区牙槽嵴尺寸及形态,用于即刻种植治疗计划制定。
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Jun 10;15:65. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0055-1.
5
Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.颊骨高度和厚度的锥形束计算机断层扫描影像测量的准确性和可靠性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):734-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021.
6
Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy.因种植治疗前来就诊患者上颌后牙区无牙颌部位的解剖特征及尺寸
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):337-45. doi: 10.11607/prd.1475.
7
Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.下颌骨后部的骨尺寸:一项使用锥形束计算机断层扫描的回顾性影像学研究。第1部分——有牙部位的分析。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Apr;32(2):175-84.
8
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion.锥形束计算机断层扫描评估非对称快速上颌扩展后的牙颌骨骼变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jan;147(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.09.014.
9
Comparison of 64-Detector-Multislice and Cone Beam Computed Tomographies in the Evaluation of Linear Measurements in the Alveolar Ridge.64层螺旋CT与锥形束CT在评估牙槽嵴线性测量中的比较
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):132-4. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4473.
10
Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描的两种印模材料和建模过程的数字模型的牙弓内和牙弓间测量分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of head orientation on mandibular bone linear measurements in CBCT imaging.CBCT成像中头部方位对下颌骨线性测量的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05954-y.
2
Mesiodistal Measurements for Dental Implant Planning: A Prospective Clinical Study of Linear Measurements on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images in Comparison with Caliper-Based Measurements on Plaster Casts.用于牙种植规划的近远中测量:一项关于锥形束计算机断层扫描图像上线性测量与石膏模型上卡尺测量对比的前瞻性临床研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Sep 7;10(9):169. doi: 10.3390/dj10090169.
3
United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
三维治疗评估的联合参考方法。
Prog Orthod. 2018 Dec 3;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0242-0.