van der Heijden Liefke C, Kok Marlies M, Lam Ming Kai, Danse Peter W, Schramm Alexander R, Jessurun Gillian A J, Tjon Joe Gin R Melvyn, van Houwelingen K Gert, Hautvast Raymond W M, Linssen Gerard C M, Sen Hanim, Löwik Marije M, IJzerman Maarten J, Doggen Carine J M, von Birgelen Clemens
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Mar;105(3):206-15. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0907-3. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcated lesions with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) was associated with increased myocardial infarction (MI) rates. Flexible stent designs that accommodate well to vessel tapering may be of benefit in challenging anatomies such as bifurcated target lesions, but so far data are scarce.
We analyzed the 2-year follow-up data of the DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) trial, which randomized 1811 all-comer patients to PCI with newer generation resolute integrity zotarolimus-eluting (Medtronic) or promus element everolimus-eluting stents (Boston Scientific). In bifurcated lesions, provisional stenting was generally performed. Target vessel failure is a composite endpoint, consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or target vessel revascularization.
Patients with at least one bifurcated lesion (n = 465, 25.7 %) versus patients with non-bifurcated target lesions only (n = 1346, 74.3 %) showed similar rates of clinical endpoints including target vessel failure (9.2 versus 7.9 %, p = 0.36) and definite stent thrombosis (0.4 versus 1.0 %, p = 0.38). Target vessel MI was more common in patients with bifurcated lesions (3.4 versus 1.6 %, p = 0.02); but after multivariate analysis with propensity score adjustment, bifurcation treatment was found not to be an independent predictor of target vessel MI (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.71-2.76; p = 0.34). Among patients with bifurcated lesions, DES type and side-branch size did not affect outcome, but periprocedural MI occurred more often after two-stent approaches (9.0 versus 2.1 %; p = 0.002).
All-comer patients treated for bifurcated and non-bifurcated target lesions showed similar and low rates of clinical endpoints, suggesting that the DES used are efficacious and safe for treating bifurcated target lesions.
使用第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)对分叉病变进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与心肌梗死(MI)发生率增加相关。能很好适应血管逐渐变细的灵活支架设计可能有利于处理诸如分叉靶病变等具有挑战性的解剖结构,但目前数据较少。
我们分析了荷兰PEERS(特温特II)试验的2年随访数据,该试验将1811例所有患者随机分为接受新一代雷帕霉素洗脱(美敦力)或依维莫司洗脱的普罗米修斯支架(波士顿科学公司)进行PCI治疗。在分叉病变中,一般采用临时支架置入术。靶血管失败是一个复合终点,包括心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或靶血管血运重建。
至少有一处分叉病变的患者(n = 465,25.7%)与仅患有非分叉靶病变的患者(n = 1346,74.3%)相比,临床终点发生率相似,包括靶血管失败(9.2%对7.9%,p = 0.36)和明确的支架血栓形成(0.4%对1.0%,p = 0.38)。靶血管心肌梗死在分叉病变患者中更常见(3.4%对1.6%,p = 0.02);但在进行倾向评分调整的多变量分析后,发现分叉病变治疗不是靶血管心肌梗死的独立预测因素(风险比1.40,95%置信区间0.71 - 2.76;p = 0.34)。在分叉病变患者中,DES类型和分支血管大小不影响预后,但在采用双支架置入术时围手术期心肌梗死更常发生(9.0%对2.1%;p = 0.002)。
接受分叉和非分叉靶病变治疗的所有患者临床终点发生率相似且较低,这表明所使用的DES对治疗分叉靶病变有效且安全。