Suppr超能文献

确定亲密关系体验的最佳拟合因素结构——以一个斯堪的纳维亚的例子进行修订

Identifying the Best-Fitting Factor Structure of the Experience of Close Relations - Revised in a Scandinavian Example.

作者信息

Esbjørn Barbara Hoff, Breinholst Sonja, Niclasen Janni, Skovgaard Louise Fabritius, Lange Katrine, Reinholdt-Dunne Marie Louise

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0137218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137218. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to enhance the understanding of cultural and sample differences in the assessment of attachment by examining the factor structure of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R). The ECR-R is a self-report measure of adult romantic attachment dimensions. The present study used a Danish sample with the purpose of addressing limitations in previous studies, such as the lack of diversity in cultural background, restricted sample characteristics, and poorly fitting structure models. Participants consisted of 253 parents of children between the ages of 7 and 12 years, 53% being mothers. The parents completed the paper version of the questionnaire. Confirmatory Factor Analyses were carried out to determine whether theoretically and empirically established models including one and two factors would also provide adequate fits in a Danish sample. A previous study using the original ECR suggested that Scandinavian samples may best be described using a five-factor solution. Our results indicated that the one- and two-factor models of the ECR-R did not fit the data well. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a five-factor model. Our study provides evidence that further investigation is needed to establish which model may provide the best model fit in the Scandinavian countries.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过检验亲密关系经历量表修订版(ECR-R)的因子结构,增强对依恋评估中文化和样本差异的理解。ECR-R是一种对成人浪漫依恋维度的自我报告测量工具。本研究采用丹麦样本,旨在解决以往研究中的局限性,如文化背景缺乏多样性、样本特征受限以及结构模型拟合不佳等问题。参与者包括253名7至12岁儿童的父母,其中53%为母亲。父母们完成了问卷的纸质版。进行了验证性因子分析,以确定包括单因素和双因素在内的理论和实证建立的模型在丹麦样本中是否也能提供充分的拟合。之前一项使用原始ECR的研究表明,斯堪的纳维亚样本可能最好用五因素解决方案来描述。我们的结果表明,ECR-R的单因素和双因素模型与数据拟合不佳。探索性因子分析揭示了一个五因素模型。我们的研究提供了证据,表明需要进一步研究以确定哪种模型在斯堪的纳维亚国家可能提供最佳的模型拟合。

相似文献

1
Identifying the Best-Fitting Factor Structure of the Experience of Close Relations - Revised in a Scandinavian Example.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0137218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137218. eCollection 2015.
3
Experiences in Close Relationships – Psychometric properties among patients with personality disorders.
Personal Ment Health. 2015 Aug;9(3):208-19. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1298. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
4
Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) Scale.
Psychol Rep. 2014 Jun;114(3):785-801. doi: 10.2466/03.21.PR0.114k23w9. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
9
Psychometrics and validity of the Dutch Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-r) in an outpatient mental health sample.
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):217-24. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.740540. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) Scale.
Psychol Rep. 2014 Jun;114(3):785-801. doi: 10.2466/03.21.PR0.114k23w9. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
3
Psychometrics and validity of the Dutch Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-r) in an outpatient mental health sample.
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):217-24. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.740540. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
6
The Child Attachment Interview: a psychometric study of reliability and discriminant validity.
Dev Psychol. 2008 Jul;44(4):939-956. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.939.
7
[Evaluation of the German version of the attachment questionnaire "Experiences in Close Relationships--Revised" (ECR-RD)].
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2009 Jun;59(6):215-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1067425. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
9
An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):350-65. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350.
10
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Mar;52(3):511-24. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.3.511.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验