文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Poor structural social support is associated with an increased risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.

作者信息

Altevers J, Lukaschek K, Baumert J, Kruse J, Meisinger C, Emeny R T, Ladwig K H

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.

German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), partner site Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2016 Jan;33(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/dme.12951. Epub 2015 Oct 6.


DOI:10.1111/dme.12951
PMID:26331457
Abstract

AIMS: Several psychosocial factors have been shown to increase the risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study investigated the association between structural social support and incidence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in men and women. METHODS: Data were derived from three population-based MONICA/KORA surveys conducted in 1984-1995 in the Augsburg region (southern Germany) and followed up by 2009. The study population comprised 8952 participants (4669 men/4283 women) aged 30-74 years without diabetes at baseline. Structural social support was assessed using the Social Network Index. Sex-specific hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Within follow-up, 904 incident Type 2 diabetes mellitus cases (558 men, 346 women) were observed. Crude incidence rates for Type 2 diabetes mellitus per 10 000 person-years were substantially higher in poor compared with good structural social support (men: 94 vs. 69, women: 58 vs. 43). After adjustment for age, survey, parental history of diabetes, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, BMI, education, sleep complaints and depressed mood, risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus for participants with poor compared with good structural social support was 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11-1.55] in men and 1.10 (95% CI = 0.88-1.37) in women. Stratified analyses revealed a hazard ratio of 1.50 (95% CI = 1.23-1.83) in men with a low level of education and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.62-1.22) in men with a high level of education (P for interaction: 0.0082). CONCLUSIONS: Poor structural social support is associated with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in men. This association is independent of risk factors at baseline and is particularly pronounced in men with a low level of education.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Poor structural social support is associated with an increased risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.

Diabet Med. 2016-1

[2]
Living alone is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men but not women from the general population: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Cohort Study.

Psychosom Med. 2009-9

[3]
Sex differences in risk factors for incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the MONICA Augsburg cohort study.

Arch Intern Med. 2002-1-14

[4]
Job strain as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.

Psychosom Med. 2014-9

[5]
Leisure time physical activity and the risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women from the general population. The MONICA/KORA Augsburg Cohort Study.

Diabetologia. 2005-1

[6]
Association of cigarette smoking and tar and nicotine intake with development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men and women from the general population: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Cohort Study.

Diabetologia. 2006-8

[7]
Blood pressure and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men and women from the general population: the Monitoring Trends and Determinants on Cardiovascular Diseases/Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg Cohort Study.

J Hypertens. 2008-9

[8]
Sex differences in the prediction of type 2 diabetes by inflammatory markers: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg case-cohort study, 1984-2002.

Diabetes Care. 2007-4

[9]
Association of fetuin-A with incident type 2 diabetes: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg study and a systematic meta-analysis.

Eur J Endocrinol. 2018-2-8

[10]
Body fat distribution and risk of type 2 diabetes in the general population: are there differences between men and women? The MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.

Am J Clin Nutr. 2006-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Safety net or social barrier? Social networks and barriers to monitoring type 2 diabetes management among Black/African American men.

Prev Med Rep. 2025-6-12

[2]
Psychological Factors and Prevalence of Diabetes and Prediabetes in a United States-Mexico Border Community.

Ethn Dis. 2025-3-17

[3]
Healthcare providers' perceived importance and barriers to addressing social connection in medical settings.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025-3

[4]
Blind spots in health perception: the underestimated role of social connection for health outcomes.

BMC Public Health. 2025-2-12

[5]
The societal cost of 'unwanted' loneliness in Spain.

Eur J Health Econ. 2025-6

[6]
Loneliness in the college student population: Prevalence and associations with substance use outcomes.

J Am Coll Health. 2024-9-20

[7]
Which Social Variables Predict Diabetes Onset? Robust Findings in Two National Surveys.

Gerontologist. 2024-10-1

[8]
Prediabetes Progression and Reversion: Social Factors and Racial/Ethnic Differences.

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025-8

[9]
Combined associations of visceral adipose tissue and adherence to a Mediterranean lifestyle with T2D and diabetic microvascular complications among individuals with prediabetes.

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024-6-12

[10]
Associations between dimensions of the social environment and cardiometabolic risk factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SSM Popul Health. 2023-11-25

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索