Suppr超能文献

大学生样本并不总是等同的:不同学院和大学之间人格差异的程度

College Student Samples Are Not Always Equivalent: The Magnitude of Personality Differences Across Colleges and Universities.

作者信息

Corker Katherine S, Donnellan M Brent, Kim Su Yeong, Schwartz Seth J, Zamboanga Byron L

机构信息

Kenyon College.

Texas A&M University.

出版信息

J Pers. 2017 Apr;85(2):123-135. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12224. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

Abstract

This research examined the magnitude of personality differences across different colleges and universities to understand (a) how much students at different colleges vary from one another and (b) whether there are site-level variables that can explain observed differences. Nearly 8,600 students at 30 colleges and universities completed a Big Five personality trait measure. Site-level information was obtained from the Integrated Postsecondary Education System database (U.S. Department of Education). Multilevel models revealed that each of the Big Five traits showed significant between-site variability, even after accounting for individual-level demographic differences. Some site-level variables (e.g., enrollment size, requiring letters of recommendation) explained between-site differences in traits, but many tests were not statistically significant. Student samples at different universities differed in terms of average levels of Big Five personality domains. This raises the possibility that personality differences may explain differences in research results obtained when studying students at different colleges and universities. Furthermore, results suggest that research that compares findings for only a few sites (e.g., much cross-cultural research) runs the risk of overgeneralizing differences between specific samples to broader group differences. These results underscore the value of multisite collaborative research efforts to enhance psychological research.

摘要

本研究考察了不同学院和大学之间人格差异的程度,以了解:(a)不同学院的学生彼此之间的差异有多大;(b)是否存在能够解释所观察到的差异的学校层面变量。30所学院和大学的近8600名学生完成了一项大五人格特质测量。学校层面的信息来自综合高等教育系统数据库(美国教育部)。多层次模型显示,即使在考虑了个体层面的人口统计学差异之后,大五人格特质中的每一项都表现出显著的校际差异。一些学校层面的变量(如招生规模、要求推荐信)解释了特质方面的校际差异,但许多检验在统计上并不显著。不同大学的学生样本在大五人格领域的平均水平上存在差异。这增加了一种可能性,即人格差异可能解释在研究不同学院和大学的学生时所获得的研究结果的差异。此外,结果表明,仅比较少数几个学校的研究结果(例如,许多跨文化研究)存在将特定样本之间的差异过度推广到更广泛的群体差异的风险。这些结果强调了多地点合作研究对加强心理学研究的价值。

相似文献

3
The differential prevalence of obesity and related behaviors in two- vs. four-year colleges.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Feb;19(2):453-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.262. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
4
A Web-based review of sexual and reproductive health services available at colleges and universities in Georgia.
J Am Coll Health. 2019 Feb-Mar;67(2):132-143. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1462825. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
5
[Personality profiles of students at risk of dropping out: Resilients, Overcontrollers and Undercontrollers].
Encephale. 2019 Apr;45(2):152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Differential prevalence of alcohol use among 2-year and 4-year college students.
Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;36(12):1353-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.037. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
7
Geographic Proximity of Waterpipe Smoking Establishments to Colleges in the U.S.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):e9-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
8
Tuberculin skin test screening practices among US colleges and universities.
JAMA. 1998 Dec 16;280(23):2008-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.23.2008.
9
Trait aggression in two representative U.S. surveys: Testing the generalizability of college samples.
Aggress Behav. 2015 Mar;41(2):171-88. doi: 10.1002/ab.21547. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

2
Associations between Self-Reports and Device-Reports of Social Networking Site Use: An Application of the Truth and Bias Model.
Commun Methods Meas. 2021;15(2):156-163. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2021.1918654. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
3
The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network.
Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;1(4):501-515. doi: 10.1177/2515245918797607. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
Modeling Measurement as a Sequential Process: Autoregressive Confirmatory Factor Analysis (AR-CFA).
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 20;10:2108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02108. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Good Choices, Poor Choices: Relationship Between the Quality of Identity Commitments and Psychosocial Functioning.
Emerg Adulthood. 2013 Sep 14;1(3):163-174. doi: 10.1177/2167696813484004. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
2
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):615-31. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459058.
3
A Theory of the Emergence, Persistence, and Expression of Geographic Variation in Psychological Characteristics.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):339-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00084.x.
4
Regional personality differences in Great Britain.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0122245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122245. eCollection 2015.
6
Why do different people choose different university degrees? Motivation and the choice of degree.
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 13;5:1244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01244. eCollection 2014.
9
Introduction to the special issue on college student mental health.
J Clin Psychol. 2013 Apr;69(4):291-7. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21972. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
10
Military training and personality trait development: does the military make the man, or does the man make the military?
Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar;23(3):270-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611423545. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验