Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 78712, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Jul;72(4):622-32. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.622.
Although alcohol use and related problems are highly prevalent in emerging adulthood overall, college students drink somewhat more than do their peers who do not attend college. The personal or social influences underlying this difference, however, are not yet well understood. The present study examined whether personality traits (i.e., self-regulation and sensation seeking) and peer influence (i.e., descriptive drinking norms) contributed to student status differences.
At approximately age 22, 4-year college students (n = 331) and noncollege emerging adults (n = 502) completed web-based surveys, including measures of alcohol use, alcohol-related problems, personality, and social norms.
College students drank only slightly more heavily. This small difference, however, reflected personality suppression. College students were lower in trait-based risk for drinking, and accounting for traits revealed a stronger positive association between attending college and drinking more heavily. Although noncollege emerging adults reported greater descriptive drinking norms for social group members, norms appeared to more strongly influence alcohol use among college students. Finally, despite drinking less, noncollege individuals experienced more alcohol-related problems.
The association between attending college and drinking heavily may be larger than previously estimated, and it may be masked by biased selection into college as a function of both self-regulation and sensation seeking. Differing patterns of alcohol use, its predictors, and its consequences emerged for the college and noncollege samples, suggesting that differing intervention strategies may best meet the needs of each population.
尽管总体而言,酒精使用和相关问题在成年初期非常普遍,但大学生的饮酒量略高于未上大学的同龄人。然而,导致这种差异的个人或社会影响尚未得到很好的理解。本研究探讨了人格特质(即自我调节和寻求刺激)和同伴影响(即描述性饮酒规范)是否对学生身份差异有贡献。
大约在 22 岁时,4 年制大学生(n=331)和非大学新兴成年人(n=502)完成了在线调查,包括饮酒、与饮酒相关的问题、人格和社会规范的测量。
大学生的饮酒量略高一些。然而,这种微小的差异反映了人格的抑制。大学生在基于特质的饮酒风险较低,考虑到特质,上大学与饮酒量增加之间的正相关关系更强。尽管非大学新兴成年人报告了其社交群体成员的描述性饮酒规范更大,但规范似乎对大学生的饮酒行为有更强的影响。最后,尽管非大学个体的饮酒量较少,但他们经历了更多的与酒精相关的问题。
上大学与大量饮酒之间的关联可能比之前估计的要大,并且可能由于自我调节和寻求刺激的作用而被大学选择的偏见所掩盖。对于大学和非大学样本,出现了不同的饮酒模式、其预测因素及其后果,这表明不同的干预策略可能最适合满足每个群体的需求。