Nedelec B, Forget N J, Hurtubise T, Cimino S, de Muszka F, Legault A, Liu W L, de Oliveira A, Calva V, Correa J A
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre de recherche, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Skin Res Technol. 2016 Aug;22(3):263-75. doi: 10.1111/srt.12256. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
BACKGROUND: The clinical use of non-invasive instrumentation to evaluate skin characteristics for diagnostic purposes and to evaluate treatment outcomes has become more prevalent. The purpose of this study was to generate normative data for skin elasticity, erythema (vascularity), melanin (pigmentation), and thickness across a broad age range at a wide variety of anatomical locations using the Cutometer(®) (6 mm probe), Mexameter(®) , and high-frequency ultrasound in a healthy adult sample. METHODS: We measured skin characteristics of 241 healthy participants who were stratified according to age and gender. Sixteen different anatomical locations were measured using the Cutometer(®) for maximum skin deformation, gross elasticity, and biological elasticity, the Mexameter(®) for erythema and melanin, and high-frequency ultrasound for skin thickness. Standardized measurement procedures were applied for all participants. RESULTS: The means and standard deviations for each measured skin characteristic for females and males across five different age groups (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-85 years old) are presented. As previously described, there were variations in skin characteristics across age groups, anatomical locations, and between females and males highlighting the need to use site specific, age and gender matched data when comparing skin characteristics. CONCLUSION: The reported data provides normative data stratified by anatomical location, age, and gender that can be used by clinicians and researchers to objectively determine whether patients' skin characteristics vary significantly from healthy subjects.
背景:使用非侵入性仪器评估皮肤特征以用于诊断目的和评估治疗效果在临床上已变得更为普遍。本研究的目的是使用皮肤弹性测定仪(®)(6毫米探头)、黑素仪(®)和高频超声,在一个健康成人样本中,生成广泛年龄范围和多种解剖部位的皮肤弹性、红斑(血管分布)、黑色素(色素沉着)和厚度的标准数据。 方法:我们测量了241名根据年龄和性别分层的健康参与者的皮肤特征。使用皮肤弹性测定仪(®)测量16个不同的解剖部位,以获取最大皮肤变形、总体弹性和生物弹性;使用黑素仪(®)测量红斑和黑色素;使用高频超声测量皮肤厚度。对所有参与者应用标准化测量程序。 结果:呈现了五个不同年龄组(20 - 29岁、30 - 39岁、40 - 49岁、50 - 59岁、60 - 69岁和70 - 85岁)的男性和女性每种测量皮肤特征的均值和标准差。如前所述,不同年龄组、解剖部位以及男性和女性之间的皮肤特征存在差异,这突出表明在比较皮肤特征时需要使用特定部位、年龄和性别匹配的数据。 结论:报告的数据提供了按解剖部位、年龄和性别分层的标准数据,临床医生和研究人员可利用这些数据客观地确定患者的皮肤特征与健康受试者相比是否有显著差异。
Skin Res Technol. 2006-2
Skin Res Technol. 2014-11
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025-9
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025-6-6
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2025-2-6
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024-9-16
Commun Med (Lond). 2024-7-11