Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, El Bachiller, 7-47, Valencia 46010, Spain
Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, El Bachiller, 7-47, Valencia 46010, Spain.
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):560-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv211. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of multipoint pacing (MPP) on acute haemodynamics, cardiac contractility, and left ventricle (LV) dyssynchrony, in comparison with conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
An open-label, non-randomized, single-centre, prospective study was designed. Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included. Evaluation of pacing configurations was performed in a random order. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to obtain haemodynamic and dyssynchrony parameters. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly superior in MPP compared with baseline (38.4 ± 1.8% vs. 26.1 ± 2.2%; P < 0.001), and in conventional pacing configuration compared with baseline (33.2 ± 1.8% vs. 26.1 ± 2.2%; P = 0.007). Cardiac index (CI) was increased by 21.8 ± 5.4% and 34.7 ± 5.1% in conventional and MPP configurations, respectively (P = 0.19). Percentage of acute responders (CI increase ≥10%) was 62.9 and 85.2% in conventional and MPP, respectively (P < 0.001). LV dyssynchrony was defined by radial strain rate parameters. Baseline anteroseptal-to-posterior wall time delay was 168 ± 21 ms. It was reduced until 70.4 ± 29 ms in conventional and -6.6 ± 11 ms in MPP (conventional vs. baseline P = 0.04; MPP vs. conventional P = 0.05). Standard deviation of the time-to-peak radial strain of the 6 LV basal segments was 101 ± 9.7, 80.3 ± 9.2, and 66 ± 8.03 ms in baseline, conventional, and MPP configurations, respectively (MPP vs. basal P = 0.012). Finally, we observed a positive correlation (r = 0.69) between reduction in dyssynchrony and CI increase (P < 0.0001).
MPP showed a further reduction in LV dyssynchrony compared with conventional biventricular pacing. Moreover, MPP resulted in an additional improvement in LVEF and in CI, and this was translated into a higher number of acute responders to CRT.
本研究旨在评估多点起搏(MPP)对急性血液动力学、心肌收缩力和左心室(LV)不同步的影响,并与传统心脏再同步治疗(CRT)进行比较。
设计了一项开放标签、非随机、单中心、前瞻性研究。连续纳入 27 例患者。起搏配置的评估以随机顺序进行。经胸超声心动图用于获得血液动力学和不同步参数。与基线相比,MPP 时左心室射血分数(LVEF)显著提高(38.4±1.8%比 26.1±2.2%;P<0.001),与传统起搏配置相比,也显著提高(33.2±1.8%比 26.1±2.2%;P=0.007)。在传统和 MPP 配置中,心指数(CI)分别增加了 21.8±5.4%和 34.7±5.1%(P=0.19)。CI 增加≥10%的急性反应者百分比分别为 62.9%和 85.2%(传统与 MPP,P<0.001)。LV 不同步通过径向应变率参数定义。基线前间隔-后间隔壁时间延迟为 168±21ms。在传统起搏和 MPP 中,它分别减少到 70.4±29ms和-6.6±11ms(传统与基线相比,P=0.04;MPP 与传统相比,P=0.05)。6 个 LV 基底节段的径向应变峰值时间标准差分别为 101±9.7、80.3±9.2 和 66±8.03ms,在基线、传统和 MPP 配置中分别为(MPP 与基础相比,P=0.012)。最后,我们观察到不同步减少与 CI 增加之间存在正相关关系(r=0.69)(P<0.0001)。
与传统双心室起搏相比,MPP 可进一步减少 LV 不同步。此外,MPP 还可进一步提高 LVEF 和 CI,这导致 CRT 的急性反应者数量增加。