Moroder Philipp, Odorizzi Marco, Pizzinini Severino, Demetz Ernst, Resch Herbert, Moroder Peter
Department of Traumatology and Sports Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital, Spitalstrasse 11, 39031 Bruneck, Italy.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 2;97(17):1398-405. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01214.
Neglected osseous glenoid defects are thought to be one of the reasons for the reported high rates of recurrent instability at long-term follow-up after Bankart repair. We hypothesized that open Bankart repair for the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability in the absence of a substantial osseous glenoid defect would result in a lower long-term recurrence rate than has been reported in previous long-term studies.
Forty-seven patients were treated with a primary modified open Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between 1989 and 1994. Double-contrast computed tomography scanning was used to exclude patients with a substantial osseous glenoid defect. Forty patients (85.1%) were available for subjective and objective follow-up at a minimum of twenty years (maximum, twenty-five years). Twenty-six patients (65%) underwent clinical examination as well as bilateral shoulder radiography, and fourteen (35%) completed a self-assessment questionnaire and were interviewed by telephone.
Seven patients (17.5%) had a recurrence of instability, and six of them had the instability occur after more than eight years without symptoms. The mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score (and standard deviation) was 256.7 ± 284.8 points; the mean Rowe score, 88.7 ± 12.0 points; and the mean Subjective Shoulder Value, 90.1% ± 10.5%.The mean range of motion of the affected shoulder was decreased by 4° of abduction (p = 0.009), two levels of internal rotation (p = 0.003), 5° of internal rotation in 90° of abduction (p = 0.005), 7° of external rotation in neutral position (p < 0.001), and 7° of external rotation in 90° of abduction (p = 0.004) compared with the contralateral side. The collective instability arthropathy (CIA) index was 0.92 for the affected side and 0.35 for the contralateral side.
Open Bankart repair provides good results twenty years after surgery in terms of subjective and objective outcome measurements. However, the long-term failure rate remains high despite the exclusion of substantial osseous glenoid defects. Recurrence of instability seems to be associated with an increased shoulder-specific activity level.
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
在Bankart修复术后的长期随访中,被忽视的骨性关节盂缺损被认为是复发性不稳定发生率较高的原因之一。我们推测,对于不存在明显骨性关节盂缺损的前盂肱关节不稳定,采用开放性Bankart修复术,其长期复发率将低于以往长期研究报道的复发率。
1989年至1994年间,47例复发性前肩关节不稳定患者接受了初次改良开放性Bankart修复术。采用双对比计算机断层扫描排除存在明显骨性关节盂缺损的患者。40例患者(85.1%)接受了至少20年(最长25年)的主观和客观随访。26例患者(65%)接受了临床检查及双侧肩部X线摄影,14例患者(35%)完成了自我评估问卷并接受了电话访谈。
7例患者(17.5%)出现不稳定复发,其中6例在无症状超过8年后出现不稳定。患侧的平均西安大略肩关节不稳定指数评分(及标准差)为256.7±284.8分;平均Rowe评分为88.7±12.0分;平均主观肩关节价值为90.1%±10.5%。与对侧相比,患侧肩关节的平均活动范围在外展时减少4°(p = 0.009),内旋减少两个等级(p = 0.003),在90°外展时内旋减少5°(p = 0.005),中立位外旋减少7°(p < 0.001),在90°外展时外旋减少7°(p = 0.004)。患侧的集体不稳定关节病(CIA)指数为0.92,对侧为0.35。
从主观和客观结果测量来看,开放性Bankart修复术在术后20年取得了良好效果。然而,尽管排除了明显的骨性关节盂缺损,长期失败率仍然很高。不稳定的复发似乎与肩部特定活动水平的增加有关。
治疗性IV级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。