Laboratorio di Biomeccanica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 May;20(5):816-21. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1674-y. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
The purpose of this study is to report long-term outcomes of the arthroscopic modified Caspari technique compared to an open capsular shift surgery to treat post-traumatic anterior shoulder recurrent instability. The hypothesis was that the open surgery group would show higher degenerative changes than to the modified Caspari technique group after a follow-up from 10 to 17 years.
One hundred and ten nonrandomized consecutive patients who underwent a surgical repair of recurrent unilateral anterior shoulder instability between 1990 and 1999 were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty-two patients were available for long-term follow-up. In particular, 49 patients (59.8%) (group A) were treated with arthroscopic transglenoid modified Caspari suturing technique (mean follow-up 13.7 ± 2.2 years), whereas 33 patients (40.2%) (group B) were treated with combined open capsular shift and Bankart repair (mean follow-up 15.7 ± 2.2 years). Patients were evaluated according to the failure rate (re-dislocation), Rowe, UCLA, and Constant scores. Radiological osteoarthritis changes were ranked according to Samilson score.
There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning the failure rate (n.s.), Rowe (n.s.), UCLA (n.s.), and Constant (n.s.) scores. Group A: re-dislocation rate 12.5% (6 re-dislocations), Rowe 85.0 ± 22.6, UCLA 26.4 ± 4.8, and Constant 86.3 ± 16.7. Group B: re-dislocation rate 9% (3 re-dislocations), Rowe 83.2 ± 24.4, UCLA 26.9 ± 4.2, and Constant 87.4 ± 14.1. Radiographic findings of osteoarthritis: 2 severe (4%), 4 moderate (8%), and 12 mild (25%) in group A; 2 severe (6%), 4 moderate (12%), and 9 mild (27%) in group B; differences between groups were not statistically significant (n.s).
The results after both techniques were good in majority of patients, with no significant differences in terms of re-dislocation and osteoarthritis development. Compared to the current literature, the recurrence rate was high in both groups. The modified Caspari technique could be an arthroscopic alternative for older, non-athletic shoulders.
Therapeutic Study-Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.
本研究旨在报告关节镜下改良 Caspari 技术与开放性囊袋移位手术治疗创伤后复发性前肩不稳定的长期结果。假设在 10 至 17 年的随访后,开放性手术组的退行性改变会高于改良 Caspari 技术组。
回顾性分析了 1990 年至 1999 年间接受单侧复发性前肩不稳定手术修复的 110 例非随机连续患者。82 例患者可进行长期随访。特别是,49 例患者(59.8%)(A 组)采用关节镜下经盂肱关节改良 Caspari 缝合技术治疗(平均随访 13.7±2.2 年),而 33 例患者(40.2%)(B 组)采用开放性囊袋移位和 Bankart 修复联合治疗(平均随访 15.7±2.2 年)。根据失败率(再脱位)、Rowe、UCLA 和 Constant 评分评估患者。根据 Samilson 评分对放射学骨关节炎变化进行分级。
两组之间在失败率(无统计学意义)、Rowe(无统计学意义)、UCLA(无统计学意义)和 Constant(无统计学意义)评分方面均无统计学差异。A 组:再脱位率 12.5%(6 例再脱位),Rowe85.0±22.6,UCLA26.4±4.8,Constant86.3±16.7。B 组:再脱位率 9%(3 例再脱位),Rowe83.2±24.4,UCLA26.9±4.2,Constant87.4±14.1。放射学骨关节炎发现:A 组 2 例严重(4%)、4 例中度(8%)和 12 例轻度(25%);B 组 2 例严重(6%)、4 例中度(12%)和 9 例轻度(27%);两组之间差异无统计学意义(无统计学意义)。
两种技术的结果在大多数患者中均良好,再脱位和骨关节炎发展方面无显著差异。与当前文献相比,两组的复发率均较高。改良 Caspari 技术可能是一种针对老年非运动员肩部的关节镜替代方法。
治疗研究-回顾性比较研究,III 级。