Zhao Jichang, Liang Xiao, Xu Ke
School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Key Laboratory of Technology in Geo-spatial Information Processing and Application System, Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0136896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136896. eCollection 2015.
In social networks, it is conventionally thought that two individuals with more overlapped friends tend to establish a new friendship, which could be stated as homophily breeding new connections. While the recent hypothesis of maximum information entropy is presented as the possible origin of effective navigation in small-world networks. We find there exists a competition between information entropy maximization and homophily in local structure through both theoretical and experimental analysis. This competition suggests that a newly built relationship between two individuals with more common friends would lead to less information entropy gain for them. We demonstrate that in the evolution of the social network, both of the two assumptions coexist. The rule of maximum information entropy produces weak ties in the network, while the law of homophily makes the network highly clustered locally and the individuals would obtain strong and trust ties. A toy model is also presented to demonstrate the competition and evaluate the roles of different rules in the evolution of real networks. Our findings could shed light on the social network modeling from a new perspective.
在社交网络中,传统观点认为,拥有更多重叠朋友的两个人倾向于建立新的友谊,这可以表述为同质性孕育新的联系。而最近提出的最大信息熵假说被认为是小世界网络中有效导航的可能起源。通过理论和实验分析,我们发现在局部结构中信息熵最大化和同质性之间存在竞争。这种竞争表明,两个拥有更多共同朋友的人之间建立的新关系会导致他们获得的信息熵增益减少。我们证明,在社交网络的演化过程中,这两种假设同时存在。最大信息熵规则在网络中产生弱联系,而同质性法则使网络在局部高度聚集,个体能够获得紧密且可信任的联系。我们还提出了一个简化模型来展示这种竞争,并评估不同规则在真实网络演化中的作用。我们的研究结果可以从一个新的视角为社交网络建模提供启示。