Spiegel Matthew A, Lafage Renaud, Lafage Virginie, Ryan Devon, Marascalchi Bryan, Trimba Yuriy, Ames Christopher, Harris Bradley, Tanzi Elizabeth, Oren Jonathan, Vira Shaleen, Errico Thomas, Schwab Frank, Protopsaltis Themistocles S
*NYULMC Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Division, New York City, NY †UCSF Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, San Francisco, CA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):74-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001159.
Retrospective.
This study assessed the feasibility of combining Oswestry and Neck Disability Index (ODI and NDI) into 1 shorter "Total Disability Index" (TDI) from which reconstructed scores could be computed.
ODI and NDI are not pure assessments of disability related to back and neck, respectively. Because of similarities/redundancies of questions, ODI scores may be elevated in neck-pain patients and the converse is true for NDI in back-pain patients.
Spine patients completed ODI and NDI, and complaints were recorded as back pain (BP), neck pain (NP), or both (BNP). Questionnaire scores were compared across cohorts via descriptives and Spearman (ρ) correlations. In exploring the feasibility of merging ODI/NDI, TDI was constructed from 9 ODI and 5 NDI items. Extracting questions from TDI, reconstructed 9-item rODI and 10-item rNDI indices were formed and compared with true ODI/NDI.
There were a total of 1207 patients: 741 BP, 134 NP, and 268 BNP. Mean ODI was 37 ± 21 and mean NDI was 32 ± 21. Patients with concurrent BP and NP had significantly more disability. Seventy-eight patients of 134 (58%) patients with NP only had at least "moderate disability" by ODI and 297 of 741 (40%) patients with back pain only, had at least "moderate disability" by NDI. ODI versus NDI correlation was ρ = 0.755; ODI versus reconstructed rODI correlated at ρ = 0.985, and NDI versus reconstructed rNDI correlated at ρ = 0.967 (P < 0.01).
Elevated ODI/NDI scores in patients with isolated complaints show that disability in 1 region affects scores on both surveys. This study constructed a 14-item TDI that represents every domain of ODI/NDI with exception of ODI "Sex Life." From this TDI, reconstructed scores correlated near perfectly with true scores. TDI provides a more global assessment of spinal disability and is a questionnaire that reduces the time burden to patients. The TDI allows for simultaneous assessment of back, neck, and global spinal disability.
回顾性研究。
本研究评估了将奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数(ODI)和颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)合并为一个更简短的“总功能障碍指数”(TDI)的可行性,据此可计算重构分数。
ODI和NDI并非分别针对背部和颈部功能障碍的纯粹评估。由于问题存在相似性/冗余性,颈部疼痛患者的ODI分数可能会升高,反之,背部疼痛患者的NDI分数也会出现这种情况。
脊柱疾病患者完成ODI和NDI评估,并记录其主诉为背痛(BP)、颈痛(NP)或两者皆有(BNP)。通过描述性统计和斯皮尔曼(ρ)相关性分析比较不同队列的问卷分数。在探索合并ODI/NDI的可行性时,从9项ODI和5项NDI条目中构建了TDI。从TDI中提取问题,形成了9项重构的rODI和10项重构rNDI指数,并与真实的ODI/NDI进行比较。
共有1207例患者,其中741例为背痛患者,134例为颈痛患者,268例为背痛合并颈痛患者。ODI平均分是37±21,NDI平均分是32±21。同时患有背痛和颈痛的患者功能障碍更严重。仅患有颈痛的134例患者中有78例(58%)根据ODI至少有“中度功能障碍”,仅患有背痛的741例患者中有297例(40%)根据NDI至少有“中度功能障碍”。ODI与NDI的相关性为ρ = 0.755;ODI与重构的rODI相关性为ρ = 0.985,NDI与重构的rNDI相关性为ρ = 0.967(P < 0.01)。
单一主诉患者的ODI/NDI分数升高表明一个区域的功能障碍会影响两项调查的分数。本研究构建了一个14项的TDI,它涵盖了ODI/NDI的各个领域,但不包括ODI中的“性生活”领域。从这个TDI得出的重构分数与真实分数几乎完全相关。TDI提供了对脊柱功能障碍更全面的评估,是一份减轻患者时间负担的问卷。TDI允许同时评估背部、颈部和整体脊柱功能障碍。