Darroch Simon A F, Sperling Erik A, Boag Thomas H, Racicot Rachel A, Mason Sara J, Morgan Alex S, Tweedt Sarah, Myrow Paul, Johnston David T, Erwin Douglas H, Laflamme Marc
Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 121, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN 37235-1805, USA
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall Bldg. 320, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 7;282(1814). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1003.
The latest Neoproterozoic extinction of the Ediacara biota has been variously attributed to catastrophic removal by perturbations to global geochemical cycles, 'biotic replacement' by Cambrian-type ecosystem engineers, and a taphonomic artefact. We perform the first critical test of the 'biotic replacement' hypothesis using combined palaeoecological and geochemical data collected from the youngest Ediacaran strata in southern Namibia. We find that, even after accounting for a variety of potential sampling and taphonomic biases, the Ediacaran assemblage preserved at Farm Swartpunt has significantly lower genus richness than older assemblages. Geochemical and sedimentological analyses confirm an oxygenated and non-restricted palaeoenvironment for fossil-bearing sediments, thus suggesting that oxygen stress and/or hypersalinity are unlikely to be responsible for the low diversity of communities preserved at Swartpunt. These combined analyses suggest depauperate communities characterized the latest Ediacaran and provide the first quantitative support for the biotic replacement model for the end of the Ediacara biota. Although more sites (especially those recording different palaeoenvironments) are undoubtedly needed, this study provides the first quantitative palaeoecological evidence to suggest that evolutionary innovation, ecosystem engineering and biological interactions may have ultimately caused the first mass extinction of complex life.
埃迪卡拉生物群在新元古代晚期的灭绝,原因众说纷纭,有人认为是全球地球化学循环扰动导致的灾难性灭绝,有人认为是寒武纪类型的生态系统改造者进行的“生物替代”,还有人认为这是一种埋藏学假象。我们利用从纳米比亚南部最年轻的埃迪卡拉纪地层收集的古生态和地球化学数据,首次对“生物替代”假说进行了关键检验。我们发现,即便考虑到各种潜在的采样和埋藏学偏差,斯瓦特蓬特农场保存的埃迪卡拉纪生物组合的属丰富度仍显著低于较老的生物组合。地球化学和沉积学分析证实,含化石沉积物的古环境是有氧且无限制的,因此表明氧胁迫和/或高盐度不太可能是斯瓦特蓬特保存的群落多样性低的原因。这些综合分析表明,群落贫化是新元古代晚期的特征,并为埃迪卡拉生物群末期的生物替代模型提供了首个定量支持。尽管无疑还需要更多地点(尤其是那些记录不同古环境的地点),但这项研究提供了首个定量古生态证据,表明进化创新、生态系统改造和生物相互作用可能最终导致了复杂生命的首次大规模灭绝。