Szyguła-Jurkiewicz Bożena, Zakliczyński Michał, Andrejczuk Mariusz, Mościński Mateusz, Zembala Marian
3 Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland.
Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation, Medical University of Silesia, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland.
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2014 Jun;11(2):178-81. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2014.43847. Epub 2014 Jun 29.
Risk stratification in heart failure (HF) patients is an important element for management. There are several risk stratification models that can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with HF, such as Aaronson's scale, CVM-HF (CardioVascular Medicine Heart Failure), the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) and the Munich score. These models fail to adequately address the impact of multiorgan dysfunction on prognosis. The classical Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score consists of: total bilirubin, INR (international normalized ratio) and creatinine level. There are some modifications of the MELD scale: MELD-XI, which excludes the INR score; the mod-MELD score, in which INR is replaced with albumin levels; and MELD-Na, which consists of the bilirubin and creatinine levels, INR ratio and the sodium level. Therefore, the MELD score systems are markers of multisystem dysfunction (renal, cardiac, hepatic). It is important that they are composed of routinely collected laboratory measures which are easy to use.
心力衰竭(HF)患者的风险分层是管理的重要组成部分。有几种风险分层模型可用于预测HF患者的预后,如阿伦森量表、心血管医学心力衰竭模型(CVM-HF)、西雅图心力衰竭模型(SHFM)和慕尼黑评分。这些模型未能充分解决多器官功能障碍对预后的影响。经典的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分包括:总胆红素、国际标准化比值(INR)和肌酐水平。MELD量表有一些修改版本:排除INR评分的MELD-XI;用白蛋白水平取代INR的改良MELD评分;以及由胆红素、肌酐水平、INR比值和钠水平组成的MELD-Na。因此,MELD评分系统是多系统功能障碍(肾脏、心脏、肝脏)的标志物。重要的是,它们由易于使用的常规收集的实验室指标组成。