Kogawa Rikitake, Okumura Yasuo, Watanabe Ichiro, Kofune Masayoshi, Nagashima Koichi, Mano Hiroaki, Sonoda Kazumasa, Sasaki Naoko, Ohkubo Kimie, Nakai Toshiko, Hirayama Atsushi
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Ohyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.
J Arrhythm. 2015 Apr;31(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
The presence of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) and high dominant frequencies (DFs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) have been demonstrated to be related to AF maintenance. Therefore, sequential mapping of CFAEs and DFs have been used for target sites of AF ablation. However, such mapping strategies are valid only if the CFAEs and DFs are spatiotemporally stable during the mapping procedure. We obtained spatially stable multi-electrode recordings to assess the spatiotemporal stability of CFAEs and DFs.
We recorded electrical activity during AF for 10 min with a 64-electrode basket catheter (48 bipole electrode pairs) placed in the left atrium in 36 patients with AF (paroxysmal AF [PAF], n=16; persistent AF [PerAF], n=20). The spatial and temporal distribution of the CFAEs (fractionation interval <120 ms) and high DFs (>8 Hz) at 1-min intervals for 10 min were compared for each of the 48 bipoles.
The baseline CFAEs were located at 68.5±14.0% (32.9±6.7) of the 48 bipoles; however, the high DF sites were fewer (9.6±8.6% [4.6±4.1 bipoles]). The CFAEs sites did not change significantly during the 10-min recording period (kappa statistic: 0.71±0.24); however, the high DF sites changed significantly (kappa statistic: 0.07±0.19). These spatiotemporal changes in the CFAEs and high DFs did not differ between patients with PAF and PerAF.
Regardless of the AF type, CFAEs sites, but not high DF sites, showed a high degree of spatial and temporal stability.
心房颤动(AF)期间复杂碎裂心房电图(CFAE)和高主导频率(DF)的存在已被证明与房颤维持有关。因此,CFAE和DF的序贯标测已被用于房颤消融的靶点。然而,只有当CFAE和DF在标测过程中时空稳定时,这种标测策略才有效。我们获取了空间稳定的多电极记录,以评估CFAE和DF的时空稳定性。
我们使用64极篮状导管(48对双极电极)在36例房颤患者(阵发性房颤[PAF],n = 16;持续性房颤[PerAF],n = 20)的左心房记录房颤期间10分钟的电活动。对48个双极电极中的每一个,以1分钟的间隔比较10分钟内CFAE(碎裂间期<120毫秒)和高DF(>8赫兹)的空间和时间分布。
基线CFAE位于48个双极电极的68.5±14.0%(32.9±6.7)处;然而,高DF位点较少(9.6±8.6%[4.6±4.1个双极电极])。在10分钟的记录期内,CFAE位点没有显著变化(kappa统计量:0.71±0.24);然而,高DF位点有显著变化(kappa统计量:0.07±0.19)。PAF和PerAF患者之间,CFAE和高DF的这些时空变化没有差异。
无论房颤类型如何,CFAE位点而非高DF位点显示出高度的时空稳定性。