Volpe Alessandro, Bollito Enrico, Bozzola Cristina, Di Domenico Antonia, Bertolo Riccardo, Zegna Luisa, Duregon Eleonora, Boldorini Renzo, Porpiglia Francesco, Terrone Carlo
Divisions of Urology and Pathology, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Divisions of Urology and Pathology, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Feb;14(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
A standardized histologic definition and classification of the patterns of renal tumor pseudocapsular invasion (RTPI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not available. We classified RTPI into 2 main histologic patterns: expansive and infiltrative RTPI. Patients with organ-confined RCC and infiltrative RTPI had a greater risk of cancer-specific death and might require stricter postoperative surveillance strategies.
A standardized histologic definition and classification of patterns of renal tumor pseudocapsular invasion (RTPI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not available. The aim of the present study was to propose a classification of RTPI patterns and assess their correlation with other pathologic features and prognosis.
The renal tumor pseudocapsule was assessed by 2 expert genitourinary pathologists on the histologic slides of 190 specimens from radical nephrectomy performed for organ-confined (pT1-pT2) RCC. The histologic patterns of RTPI were classified and described. The association between the RTPI patterns and other pathologic features was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival functions, and Cox regression models were used to assess the predictors of cancer-specific survival.
RTPI was classified into 2 main histologic patterns (expansive and infiltrative). Expansive and infiltrative RTPI was observed in 39.5% and 51.6% of cases, respectively. A significant association between the RTPI pattern and Fuhrman grade (P = .006) and RCC histologic subtype (P = .034) was detected. Patients with infiltrative pseudocapsular invasion had significantly poorer 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rates than patients with expansive invasion or no invasion (93.6% vs. 98.9% and 84.9% vs. 93%, respectively; P = .039). The presence of infiltrative pseudocapsular invasion was a significant predictor of cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 4.38, 95% confidence interval 1.04-20.27).
An expansive and an infiltrative RTPI pattern can be described. In our study, patients with organ-confined RCC and an infiltrative RTPI pattern had a greater risk of cancer-specific death and might require stricter postoperative surveillance strategies.
目前尚无肾细胞癌(RCC)中肾肿瘤假包膜侵犯(RTPI)模式的标准化组织学定义和分类。我们将RTPI分为2种主要组织学模式:膨胀性和浸润性RTPI。局限性RCC且伴有浸润性RTPI的患者癌症特异性死亡风险更高,可能需要更严格的术后监测策略。
目前尚无肾细胞癌(RCC)中肾肿瘤假包膜侵犯(RTPI)模式的标准化组织学定义和分类。本研究的目的是提出RTPI模式的分类,并评估其与其他病理特征及预后的相关性。
由2名泌尿生殖系统病理专家对190例因局限性(pT1 - pT2)RCC行根治性肾切除术的标本组织切片进行肾肿瘤假包膜评估。对RTPI的组织学模式进行分类和描述。评估RTPI模式与其他病理特征之间的关联。采用Kaplan - Meier法计算生存函数,采用Cox回归模型评估癌症特异性生存的预测因素。
RTPI分为2种主要组织学模式(膨胀性和浸润性)。膨胀性和浸润性RTPI分别见于39.5%和51.6%的病例。检测到RTPI模式与Fuhrman分级(P = 0.006)及RCC组织学亚型(P = 0.034)之间存在显著关联。浸润性假包膜侵犯的患者5年和10年癌症特异性生存率显著低于膨胀性侵犯或无侵犯的患者(分别为93.6%对98.9%和84.9%对93%;P = 0.039)。浸润性假包膜侵犯的存在是癌症特异性生存的显著预测因素(风险比4.38,95%置信区间1.04 - 20.27)。
可描述膨胀性和浸润性RTPI模式。在我们的研究中,局限性RCC且伴有浸润性RTPI模式的患者癌症特异性死亡风险更高,可能需要更严格的术后监测策略。