Chen Peii, Ward Irene, Khan Ummais, Liu Yan, Hreha Kimberly
Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA
Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, NJ, USA.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jun;30(5):451-60. doi: 10.1177/1545968315604397. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
Background Current knowledge about spatial neglect and its impact on rehabilitation mostly originates from stroke studies. Objective To examine the impact of spatial neglect on rehabilitation outcome in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods The retrospective study included 156 consecutive patients with TBI (73 women; median age = 69.5 years; interquartile range = 50-81 years) at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). We examined whether the presence of spatial neglect affected the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, length of stay, or discharge disposition. Based on the available medical records, we also explored whether spatial neglect was associated with tactile sensation or muscle strength asymmetry in the extremities and whether specific brain injuries or lesions predicted spatial neglect. Results In all, 30.1% (47 of 156) of the sample had spatial neglect. Sex, age, severity of TBI, or time postinjury did not differ between patients with and without spatial neglect. In comparison to patients without spatial neglect, patients with the disorder stayed in IRF 5 days longer, had lower FIM scores at discharge, improved slower in both Cognitive and Motor FIM scores, and might have less likelihood of return home. In addition, left-sided neglect was associated with asymmetric strength in the lower extremities, specifically left weaker than the right. Finally, brain injury-induced mass effect predicted left-sided neglect. Conclusions Spatial neglect is common following TBI, impedes rehabilitation progress in both motor and cognitive domains, and prolongs length of stay. Future research is needed for linking specific traumatic injuries and lesioned networks to spatial neglect and related impairment.
目前关于空间忽视及其对康复影响的知识大多源自中风研究。目的:探讨空间忽视对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者康复结局的影响。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了一家住院康复机构(IRF)的156例连续的TBI患者(73名女性;年龄中位数 = 69.5岁;四分位间距 = 50 - 81岁)。我们检查了空间忽视的存在是否会影响功能独立性测量(FIM)评分、住院时间或出院处置情况。基于现有的病历记录,我们还探究了空间忽视是否与四肢的触觉或肌肉力量不对称相关,以及特定的脑损伤或病变是否可预测空间忽视。结果:样本中共有30.1%(156例中的47例)存在空间忽视。有或无空间忽视的患者在性别、年龄、TBI严重程度或受伤后时间方面并无差异。与无空间忽视的患者相比,患有该障碍的患者在IRF的住院时间长5天,出院时FIM评分更低,认知和运动FIM评分改善更慢,且回家的可能性可能更小。此外,左侧忽视与下肢力量不对称相关,具体表现为左侧比右侧弱。最后,脑损伤引起的占位效应可预测左侧忽视。结论:TBI后空间忽视很常见,会阻碍运动和认知领域的康复进程,并延长住院时间。需要进一步研究将特定的创伤性损伤和受损网络与空间忽视及相关损伤联系起来。