• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

凯斯勒基金会疏忽评估流程专门用于测量日常生活活动中的空间疏忽。

Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living.

作者信息

Chen Peii, Chen Christine C, Hreha Kimberly, Goedert Kelly M, Barrett A M

机构信息

Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas, El Paso, TX.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):869-876.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.023
PMID:25461827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4410062/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the factor structure of the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP), and evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of spatial neglect among stroke survivors.

DESIGN

Inception cohort.

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N=121) with unilateral brain damage from their first stroke were assessed within 72 hours of admission to an IRF, and 108 were assessed again within 72 hours before IRF discharge.

INTERVENTIONS

Usual and standard IRF care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

During each assessment session, occupational therapists measured patients' functions with the KF-NAP, FIM, and Barthel Index (BI).

RESULTS

The KF-NAP showed excellent internal consistency with a single-factor structure. The exploratory factor analysis revealed the KF-NAP to be unique from both the FIM and BI even though all 3 scales were correlated. Symptoms of spatial neglect (KF-NAP>0) were present in 67.8% of the participants at admission and 47.2% at discharge. Participants showing the disorder at IRF admission were hospitalized longer than those showing no symptoms. Among those presenting with symptoms, the regression analysis showed that the KF-NAP scores at admission negatively predicted FIM scores at discharge, after controlling for age, FIM at admission, and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The KF-NAP uniquely quantifies symptoms of spatial neglect by measuring functional difficulties that are not captured by the FIM or BI. Using the KF-NAP to measure spatial neglect, we found the disorder persistent after inpatient rehabilitation, and replicated previous findings showing that spatial neglect adversely affects rehabilitation outcome even after prolonged IRF care.

摘要

目的

探讨凯斯勒基金会疏忽评估流程(KF-NAP)的因素结构,并评估中风幸存者中空间疏忽的患病率及临床意义。

设计

起始队列研究。

地点

住院康复机构(IRF)。

参与者

121名首次中风导致单侧脑损伤的参与者在入住IRF后72小时内接受评估,108名参与者在IRF出院前72小时内再次接受评估。

干预措施

常规和标准的IRF护理。

主要结局指标

在每次评估期间,职业治疗师使用KF-NAP、FIM和巴氏指数(BI)测量患者的功能。

结果

KF-NAP显示出具有单因素结构的出色内部一致性。探索性因素分析表明,尽管所有三个量表都相关,但KF-NAP与FIM和BI均不同。入院时67.8%的参与者存在空间疏忽症状(KF-NAP>0),出院时为47.2%。在IRF入院时表现出该障碍的参与者住院时间比无症状者更长。在有症状的参与者中,回归分析表明,在控制年龄、入院时的FIM和住院时间后,入院时的KF-NAP评分可负向预测出院时的FIM评分。

结论

KF-NAP通过测量FIM或BI未涵盖的功能困难,独特地量化了空间疏忽症状。使用KF-NAP测量空间疏忽,我们发现该障碍在住院康复后仍然存在,并重复了先前的研究结果,即即使经过长时间的IRF护理,空间疏忽仍会对康复结果产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living.凯斯勒基金会疏忽评估流程专门用于测量日常生活活动中的空间疏忽。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):869-876.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
2
Impact of spatial neglect on stroke rehabilitation: evidence from the setting of an inpatient rehabilitation facility.空间忽视对脑卒中康复的影响:来自一家住院康复机构的证据。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8):1458-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
Behavioral Assessment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect with the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) Using the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) in Patients with Subacute Stroke during Rehabilitation in Japan.日本亚急性期脑卒中康复患者中,使用凯斯勒基金会忽略评估过程(KF-NAP),对单侧空间忽略的 Catherine Bergego 量表(CBS)进行行为评估。
Behav Neurol. 2021 Feb 9;2021:8825192. doi: 10.1155/2021/8825192. eCollection 2021.
4
Effect of subtypes of neglect on functional outcome in stroke patients.忽视亚型对脑卒中患者功能结局的影响。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Nov;60(6):376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.07.245. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
5
Severity of unilateral spatial neglect is an independent predictor of functional outcome after acute inpatient rehabilitation in individuals with right hemispheric stroke.单侧空间忽略的严重程度是右半球卒中患者急性住院康复后功能结局的独立预测因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Aug;92(8):1250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.018.
6
How We Assess Spatial Neglect Matters: Prevalence of Spatial Neglect as Measured by the Catherine Bergego Scale and Impact on Rehabilitation Outcomes.我们如何评估空间忽略的问题:用 Catherine Bergego 量表测量的空间忽略的患病率及其对康复结果的影响。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May 1;100(5):443-449. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001710.
7
Psychometric evaluation of neglect assessment reveals motor-exploratory predictor of functional disability in acute-stage spatial neglect.忽略评估的心理测量学评估揭示了急性空间忽略期功能障碍的运动探索性预测因子。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.036.
8
Functional assessment of spatial neglect: a review of the Catherine Bergego scale and an introduction of the Kessler foundation neglect assessment process.空间忽略的功能评估:Catherine Bergego 量表的回顾及凯斯勒基金会忽略评估过程的介绍。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):423-35. doi: 10.1310/tsr1905-423.
9
Racial/ethnic differences in FIM scores and length of stay for underinsured patients undergoing stroke inpatient rehabilitation.未参保卒中住院康复患者功能独立性测量(FIM)评分及住院时间的种族/民族差异。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 May;85(5):415-23. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000214320.99729.f3.
10
Assessing chronic stroke survivors with aphasia sheds light on prevalence of spatial neglect.对慢性中风失语症幸存者进行评估有助于了解空间忽视的患病率。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Mar;24(2):91-98. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1196906. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Susceptibility to multitasking in stroke is associated to multiple-demand system damage and leads to lateralized visuospatial deficits.中风患者对多任务处理的易感性与多需求系统损伤有关,并导致偏侧化视觉空间缺陷。
Commun Biol. 2025 May 12;8(1):734. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08074-z.
2
Does prism adaptation treatment reduce spatial neglect and improve function?棱镜适应疗法能减少空间忽视并改善功能吗?
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Feb 5;6:1539887. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1539887. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of Prone Posture Maneuver to Ameliorate Pusher Behavior in Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study.俯卧位手法改善急性脑卒中患者推搡行为的效果:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 20;13(24):7805. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247805.
4
Diagnosis of spatial neglect and rehabilitation access for stroke survivors.中风幸存者的空间忽视诊断与康复途径
Cogent Gerontol. 2024;3(1). doi: 10.1080/28324897.2024.2375706. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
5
Understanding Occupational Therapists' Knowledge and Confidence When Assessing for Spatial Neglect: A Special Issue Review.理解作业治疗师在评估空间忽略时的知识和信心:特刊述评。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Mar 1;78(2). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050354.
6
Task-based and Magnified Mirror Therapy for Unilateral Spatial Neglect among post-stroke subjects: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于任务的和放大镜像疗法治疗脑卒中后单侧空间忽略症的随机对照试验研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 24;19(1):e0296276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296276. eCollection 2024.
7
Immersive virtual reality gameplay detects visuospatial atypicality, including unilateral spatial neglect, following brain injury: a pilot study.沉浸式虚拟现实游戏可检测脑损伤后出现的视空间异常,包括单侧忽略:一项初步研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Nov 23;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01283-9.
8
Neglect scoring modifications in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improve right hemisphere stroke lesion volume prediction.忽略国立卫生研究院卒中量表中的忽视评分修正可提高右侧半球卒中病灶体积的预测能力。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Feb;31(2):e16133. doi: 10.1111/ene.16133. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
9
Digital Therapeutics for the Egocentric and Allocentric Neglects in Patients with Brain Injury: A Mini Review.脑损伤患者自我中心性和异我中心性忽视的数字疗法:一篇综述
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 6;13(8):1170. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081170.
10
Prism Adaptation Treatment for Right-Sided and Left-Sided Spatial Neglect: A Retrospective Case-Matched Study.棱镜适应疗法治疗右侧和左侧空间忽视:一项回顾性病例匹配研究。
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023 Mar 21;5(2):100263. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100263. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of neglect dyslexia with functional reading materials.使用功能性阅读材料评估忽视性失读症。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):75-86. doi: 10.1310/tsr2101-75.
2
Severity of spatial neglect during acute inpatient rehabilitation predicts community mobility after stroke.急性住院康复期间空间忽视的严重程度可预测中风后的社区活动能力。
PM R. 2014 Aug;6(8):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
3
Predicting functional outcome after stroke: the influence of neglect on basic activities in daily living.预测卒中后的功能结局:忽视对日常生活基本活动的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 9;7:182. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00182. eCollection 2013.
4
Reliability (inter-rater agreement) of the Barthel Index for assessment of stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis.Barthel 指数评估脑卒中幸存者的可靠性(评定者间一致性):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2013 Feb;44(2):462-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678615. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
5
Functional assessment of spatial neglect: a review of the Catherine Bergego scale and an introduction of the Kessler foundation neglect assessment process.空间忽略的功能评估:Catherine Bergego 量表的回顾及凯斯勒基金会忽略评估过程的介绍。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):423-35. doi: 10.1310/tsr1905-423.
6
Patients with hemispatial neglect are more prone to limb spasticity, but this does not prolong their hospital stay.偏瘫患者更容易出现肢体痉挛,但这并不会延长他们的住院时间。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jul;93(7):1191-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
7
Psychometric evaluation of neglect assessment reveals motor-exploratory predictor of functional disability in acute-stage spatial neglect.忽略评估的心理测量学评估揭示了急性空间忽略期功能障碍的运动探索性预测因子。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.036.
8
Comparing consequences of right and left unilateral neglect in a stroke rehabilitation population.比较中风康复人群中右侧和左侧单侧忽视的后果。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;87(11):910-20. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818a58bd.
9
Assessment of spatial attention and neglect with a virtual wheelchair navigation task.使用虚拟轮椅导航任务评估空间注意力和忽视症
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Aug;30(6):650-60. doi: 10.1080/13803390701625821. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
10
Prediction of driving after stroke: a prospective study.中风后驾驶能力的预测:一项前瞻性研究。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 Sep;20(3):417-23. doi: 10.1177/1545968306287157.