Chen Peii, Chen Christine C, Hreha Kimberly, Goedert Kelly M, Barrett A M
Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas, El Paso, TX.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):869-876.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
To explore the factor structure of the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP), and evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of spatial neglect among stroke survivors.
Inception cohort.
Inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).
Participants (N=121) with unilateral brain damage from their first stroke were assessed within 72 hours of admission to an IRF, and 108 were assessed again within 72 hours before IRF discharge.
Usual and standard IRF care.
During each assessment session, occupational therapists measured patients' functions with the KF-NAP, FIM, and Barthel Index (BI).
The KF-NAP showed excellent internal consistency with a single-factor structure. The exploratory factor analysis revealed the KF-NAP to be unique from both the FIM and BI even though all 3 scales were correlated. Symptoms of spatial neglect (KF-NAP>0) were present in 67.8% of the participants at admission and 47.2% at discharge. Participants showing the disorder at IRF admission were hospitalized longer than those showing no symptoms. Among those presenting with symptoms, the regression analysis showed that the KF-NAP scores at admission negatively predicted FIM scores at discharge, after controlling for age, FIM at admission, and length of stay.
The KF-NAP uniquely quantifies symptoms of spatial neglect by measuring functional difficulties that are not captured by the FIM or BI. Using the KF-NAP to measure spatial neglect, we found the disorder persistent after inpatient rehabilitation, and replicated previous findings showing that spatial neglect adversely affects rehabilitation outcome even after prolonged IRF care.
探讨凯斯勒基金会疏忽评估流程(KF-NAP)的因素结构,并评估中风幸存者中空间疏忽的患病率及临床意义。
起始队列研究。
住院康复机构(IRF)。
121名首次中风导致单侧脑损伤的参与者在入住IRF后72小时内接受评估,108名参与者在IRF出院前72小时内再次接受评估。
常规和标准的IRF护理。
在每次评估期间,职业治疗师使用KF-NAP、FIM和巴氏指数(BI)测量患者的功能。
KF-NAP显示出具有单因素结构的出色内部一致性。探索性因素分析表明,尽管所有三个量表都相关,但KF-NAP与FIM和BI均不同。入院时67.8%的参与者存在空间疏忽症状(KF-NAP>0),出院时为47.2%。在IRF入院时表现出该障碍的参与者住院时间比无症状者更长。在有症状的参与者中,回归分析表明,在控制年龄、入院时的FIM和住院时间后,入院时的KF-NAP评分可负向预测出院时的FIM评分。
KF-NAP通过测量FIM或BI未涵盖的功能困难,独特地量化了空间疏忽症状。使用KF-NAP测量空间疏忽,我们发现该障碍在住院康复后仍然存在,并重复了先前的研究结果,即即使经过长时间的IRF护理,空间疏忽仍会对康复结果产生不利影响。