Jin Lei, Tam Tony
Department of Sociology, RM 431, Sino Building, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Department of Sociology, RM 431, Sino Building, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;143:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
We argue that in addition to interpersonal relative deprivation, it is important to examine how temporal relative deprivation influences health, especially in rapidly changing societies such as China. We develop four competing hypotheses regarding the possible effects of temporal relative deprivation on health. Moreover, we propose that temporal relative deprivation may confound the health effects of interpersonal relative deprivation, and for the sake of conceptual clarity, temporal relative deprivation needs to be accounted for in the examination of interpersonal relative deprivation. We use data from a nationally representative survey in China; our analytical sample consists of 10,828 respondents. The dependent variables are self-rated health and the frequency of experiencing depressive symptoms. Interpersonal relative deprivation is measured by individuals' evaluation of their current positions on a 10-rung 'ladder'. We also assess individuals' subjective positions at 14 years of age and from 10 years ago. To measure temporal relative deprivation, current subjective status is compared with subjective status at the two time points in the past to construct indicators of perceived upward and downward mobility. Both diagonal mobility models and conventional logistic regression are used and the results from the two types of model are comparable. The majority of Chinese people felt that they moved up the social ladder compared with their parents or themselves 10 years ago. Perceived upward mobility is not associated with health outcomes, whereas perceived downward mobility, especially intra-generational, is a strong predictor of worse mental and physical health. These patterns are consistent with the argument that the effects of bad experiences are stronger and longer lasting than those of good ones. They also focus our attention on those who perceived downward mobility. Furthermore, evidence suggests that the health effects of current subjective status also include the cumulative influence of prior changes in one's social status.
我们认为,除了人际相对剥夺之外,研究时间相对剥夺如何影响健康也很重要,在中国这样快速变化的社会中尤其如此。我们针对时间相对剥夺对健康的可能影响提出了四种相互竞争的假设。此外,我们提出时间相对剥夺可能会混淆人际相对剥夺对健康的影响,为了概念清晰起见,在研究人际相对剥夺时需要考虑时间相对剥夺。我们使用了来自中国一项具有全国代表性的调查数据;我们的分析样本包括10828名受访者。因变量是自评健康状况和抑郁症状出现的频率。人际相对剥夺通过个体对自己在一个10级“阶梯”上当前位置的评估来衡量。我们还评估了个体在14岁时以及10年前的主观位置。为了衡量时间相对剥夺,将当前主观状态与过去两个时间点的主观状态进行比较,以构建感知向上和向下流动的指标。同时使用了对角线流动模型和传统逻辑回归,两种模型的结果具有可比性。与他们的父母或10年前的自己相比,大多数中国人觉得自己在社会阶梯上向上移动了。感知到的向上流动与健康结果无关,而感知到的向下流动,尤其是代内向下流动,是心理健康和身体健康状况较差的有力预测指标。这些模式与不良经历的影响比良好经历的影响更强、更持久的观点一致。它们还让我们将注意力集中在那些感知到向下流动的人身上。此外,有证据表明当前主观状态对健康的影响还包括个人社会地位先前变化的累积影响。