• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术中不同止血材料对卵巢储备功能影响的比较

Comparison of hemostatic sealants on ovarian reserve during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.

作者信息

Kang Jun Hyeok, Kim Yong Seok, Lee San Hui, Kim Woo Young

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Nov;194:64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.010
PMID:26344349
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether different methods of hemostasis and pathologic subtypes would lead to significant differences regarding ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were prospectively collected from 129 patients who underwent laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy with either a hemostatic sealant (FloSeal or TachoSil) or bipolar coagulation to achieve hemostasis. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels as measured by enzyme immunoassay. Measurements were made preoperatively and at 3 months postsurgery in each group [bipolar coagulator group (n=43), FloSeal group (n=46), and TachoSil group (n=40)].

RESULTS

Age, BMI, parity, sociodemographic variables, and preoperative AMH levels were similar between the three groups of patients. At 3 months post-surgery, the AMH decline rate was significantly greater in the bipolar coagulation group compared with the two hemostatic sealant groups (41.2% [IQR, 16.7-52.4] vs. 15.4% [IQR, 5.2-41.9], respectively; P=0.003). However, the AMH decline rates of the two hemostatic sealant groups (FloSeal and TachoSil) were not significantly different (15.4% [IQR, 7.8-44.6] vs. 15.9% [IQR, 0.7-41.1], P=0.962). Also, subgroup analysis according to ovarian cyst type revealed no significant differences in the rate of serum AMH decline regardless of the hemostatic method (bipolar group, P=0.30; FloSeal group, P=0.47, and TachoSil group, P=0.79).

CONCLUSION

The two hemostatic sealants (FloSeal and Tachosil) did not exhibit any significant differences regarding the preservation of ovarian reserve regardless of ovarian cyst type.

摘要

目的

确定在腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术后,不同的止血方法和病理亚型是否会导致卵巢储备功能出现显著差异。

研究设计

前瞻性收集了129例行腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术患者的数据,这些患者使用止血密封剂(FloSeal或TachoSil)或双极电凝进行止血。采用酶免疫分析法测定血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平。在每组(双极电凝组,n = 43;FloSeal组,n = 46;TachoSil组,n = 40)的患者术前及术后3个月进行测量。

结果

三组患者的年龄、体重指数、产次、社会人口统计学变量及术前AMH水平相似。术后3个月,双极电凝组的AMH下降率显著高于两种止血密封剂组(分别为41.2%[四分位间距,16.7 - 52.4] vs. 15.4%[四分位间距,5.2 - 41.9];P = 0.003)。然而,两种止血密封剂组(FloSeal和TachoSil)的AMH下降率无显著差异(15.4%[四分位间距,7.8 - 44.6] vs. 15.9%[四分位间距,0.7 - 41.1],P = 0.962)。此外,根据卵巢囊肿类型进行的亚组分析显示,无论采用何种止血方法,血清AMH下降率均无显著差异(双极电凝组,P = 0.30;FloSeal组,P = 0.47;TachoSil组,P = 0.79)。

结论

无论卵巢囊肿类型如何,两种止血密封剂(FloSeal和Tachosil)在保留卵巢储备功能方面均未表现出任何显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of hemostatic sealants on ovarian reserve during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术中不同止血材料对卵巢储备功能影响的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Nov;194:64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
2
Additional benefit of hemostatic sealant in preservation of ovarian reserve during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy: a multi-center, randomized controlled trial.止血密封剂在腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术中保留卵巢储备功能的额外益处:一项多中心随机对照试验
Hum Reprod. 2014 Aug;29(8):1659-65. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu125. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
3
Usefulness of hemostatic sealants for minimizing ovarian damage during laparoscopic cystectomy for endometriosis.止血密封剂在子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜囊肿切除术中减少卵巢损伤的效用。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Mar;44(3):532-539. doi: 10.1111/jog.13542. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
4
The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve and the exploration of related factors assessed by serum anti-Mullerian hormone: a prospective cohort study.子宫内膜异位囊肿及腹腔镜囊肿切除术对卵巢储备功能的影响以及血清抗苗勒管激素评估相关因素的探索:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Ovarian Res. 2014 Nov 26;7:108. doi: 10.1186/s13048-014-0108-0.
5
Comparing ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of endometriotic cysts and hemostasis achieved either by bipolar coagulation or suturing: a randomized clinical trial.比较腹腔镜下子宫内膜异位囊肿切除术后通过双极电凝或缝合实现止血后的卵巢储备功能:一项随机临床试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 May;293(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3918-4. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
6
Effect of hemostatic method on ovarian reserve following laparoscopic endometrioma excision; comparison of suture, hemostatic sealant, and bipolar dessication. A systematic review and meta-analysis.止血方法对腹腔镜下子宫内膜异位囊肿切除术后卵巢储备功能的影响;缝合、止血密封剂和双极电凝的比较。一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.168. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
7
Which Should Be the Preferred Technique During Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy.腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术期间哪种技术应作为首选?
Reprod Sci. 2017 Mar;24(3):393-399. doi: 10.1177/1933719116657195. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
8
Feasibility of the use of novel matrix hemostatic sealant (FloSeal) to achieve hemostasis during laparoscopic excision of endometrioma.在腹腔镜下切除子宫内膜瘤过程中使用新型基质止血密封剂(FloSeal)实现止血的可行性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.11.007. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
9
Decline of serum antimüllerian hormone levels after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in endometrioma and other benign cysts: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术(包括子宫内膜异位囊肿和其他良性囊肿)后血清抗苗勒管激素水平的下降:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Feb;101(2):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.043. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Gauze packing may be a better hemostatic method to protect ovarian reserve during laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy than conventional hemostatic methods.纱布填塞可能是腹腔镜内异症囊肿剔除术中保护卵巢储备功能优于传统止血方法的更好止血方法。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;308(3):927-934. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07088-4. Epub 2023 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Risk of Infertility After Surgery for Benign Ovarian Cysts.良性卵巢囊肿手术后的生育风险。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 May;32(5):574-582. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0385. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Using a Modified Polysaccharide as a Hemostatic Agent Results in Less Reduction of the Ovarian Reserve after Laparoscopic Surgery of Ovarian Tumors-Prospective Study.使用改良多糖作为止血剂可减少腹腔镜卵巢肿瘤手术后卵巢储备功能的下降:前瞻性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 21;59(1):14. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010014.
3
Efficacy of ablation and sclerotherapy for the management of ovarian endometrioma: A narrative review.
消融术和硬化疗法治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的疗效:一项叙述性综述。
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022 Jun;49(2):76-86. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2021.05183. Epub 2022 May 4.
4
The Effect of Laparoscopic Endometrioma Surgery on Anti-Müllerian Hormone: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症手术对抗苗勒管激素的影响:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Jan 17;26(1):88-104. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210060.
5
The Optimal Time of Ovarian Reserve Recovery After Laparoscopic Unilateral Ovarian Non-Endometriotic Cystectomy.腹腔镜单侧卵巢非子宫内膜异位囊肿剥除术后卵巢储备功能恢复的最佳时间。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 24;12:671225. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.671225. eCollection 2021.
6
Preservation of the ovarian reserve and hemostasis during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy by a hemostatic agent versus suturing for patients with ovarian endometriosis: study protocol for randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial (PRAHA-2 trial).止血剂与缝合在腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者中对卵巢储备和止血的保护作用:随机对照、非劣效性试验研究方案(PRAHA-2 试验)。
Trials. 2021 Jul 21;22(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05431-1.
7
A randomized controlled trial of ovarian reserve preservation and hemostasis during ovarian cystectomy.卵巢囊肿切除术时卵巢储备保护与止血的随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 19;11(1):8495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87965-7.
8
Practical Recommendations for the Management of Benign Adnexal Masses.实用的附件良性肿块管理建议。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;42(9):569-576. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714049. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
9
The Impact on Ovarian Reserve of Different Hemostasis Methods in Laparoscopic Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜囊肿剔除术中不同止血方法对卵巢储备功能的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Jun;41(6):400-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692697. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Systematic Review of Topical Hemostatic Agent Use in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.微创妇科手术中局部止血剂使用的系统评价
JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00070.