Nagy Corina, Turecki Gustavo
McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Hospital University Institute, 6875 Lasalle boul, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Epigenomics. 2015 Aug;7(5):781-90. doi: 10.2217/epi.15.46. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
Much controversy surrounds the idea of transgenerational epigenetics. Recent papers argue that epigenetic marks acquired through experience are passed to offspring, but as in much of the field of epigenetics, there is lack of precision in the definitions and perhaps too much eagerness to translate animal research to humans. Here, we review operational definitions of transgenerational inheritance and the processes of epigenetic programing during early development. Subsequently, based on this background, we critically examine some recent findings of studies investigating transgenerational inheritance. Finally, we discuss possible mechanisms that may explain transgenerational inheritance, including transmission of an epigenetic blueprint, which may predispose offspring to specific epigenetic patterning. Taken together, we conclude that presently, the evidence suggesting that acquired epigenetic marks are passed to the subsequent generation remains limited.
关于跨代表观遗传学的观点存在诸多争议。近期的论文认为,通过经历获得的表观遗传标记会传递给后代,但就像表观遗传学领域的许多情况一样,定义缺乏精确性,而且可能过于急于将动物研究成果应用于人类。在此,我们回顾跨代遗传的操作性定义以及早期发育过程中的表观遗传编程过程。随后,基于这一背景,我们批判性地审视了一些研究跨代遗传的近期研究发现。最后,我们讨论了可能解释跨代遗传的机制,包括表观遗传蓝图的传递,这可能使后代易于形成特定的表观遗传模式。综合来看,我们得出结论,目前,表明获得的表观遗传标记会传递给下一代的证据仍然有限。