The circumferential graft technique for treatment of multidirectional elbow instability: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.

BACKGROUND

Ligament reconstruction with a circumferential graft represents an innovative technique for treatment of multidirectional elbow instability. This biomechanical study compared the stability of the intact elbow joint with the circumferential graft technique and the conventional technique.

METHODS

Seven fresh frozen cadaveric elbows were evaluated for stability against valgus and varus/posterolateral rotatory forces (3 Nm) over the full range of motion. Primary stability was determined for intact specimens, after sectioning of the collateral ligaments, after applying the circumferential graft technique (box-loop), and after conventional collateral ligament reconstruction. Cyclic loading (1000 cycles) was performed to assess joint stability and stiffness of the native ligaments and the tendon grafts.

RESULTS

Primary stability of both reconstruction techniques was equal to the native specimens (P = .17-.91). Sectioning of the collateral ligaments significantly increased joint instability (P < .001). The reconstruction techniques provided equal stability after 1000 cycles (P = .78). Both were inferior to the intact specimens (P = .02). Cyclic loading caused a significantly lower increase in stiffness of the native ligaments compared with the tendon grafts of either reconstruction technique (P = .001-.008). Significantly better graft stiffness was retained with the circumferential graft technique compared with conventional reconstruction (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Neither reconstruction technique fully reproduces the biomechanical profile of the native collateral ligaments. The circumferential graft technique seems to resist cyclic loading slightly better than the conventional reconstruction technique, yet both reconstruction techniques provide comparable stability.