• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺结节恶性风险分层:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与 2014 年美国甲状腺协会管理指南的比较。

Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Comparison between the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and the 2014 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science (J.H.Y., E.K.K., H.J.M., J.Y.K.), and Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Medical Research Center (H.S.L.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752 Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Radiology. 2016 Mar;278(3):917-24. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150056. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2015150056
PMID:26348102
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules with the 2014 American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines and the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. From November 2013 to July 2014, 1293 thyroid nodules in 1241 patients (mean age, 50.8 years ± 13.5) were included in this study. All nodules measured at least 10 mm. Solidity, hypoechogenicity or marked hypoechogenicity, microlobulated to irregular margin, microcalcifications or mixed calcifications, and nonparallel shape were considered suspicious features at ultrasonography (US). A TIRADS category and the US pattern as determined with ATA guidelines were assigned to each nodule. The correlation between the TIRADS category or ATA pattern and the malignancy rate was evaluated with the Spearman rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 1293 thyroid nodules, 1059 (81.9%) were benign and 234 (18.1%) were malignant. Forty-four of the 1293 nodules (3.4%) did not meet the criteria for the ATA patterns and were classified as "not specified." The malignancy rates of TIRADS category 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5 nodules were 1.9% (six of 316 nodules), 4.2% (17 of 408 nodules), 12.9% (33 of 256 nodules), 49.8% (130 of 261 nodules), and 92.3% (48 of 52 nodules), respectively, with significant differences between categories (P < .001). Malignancy rates of nodules with very low, low, intermediate, and high suspicion for malignancy with the ATA guidelines and not specified patterns were 2.7% (11 of 407 nodules), 3.1% (10 of 323 nodules), 16.7% (39 of 233 nodules), 58.0% (166 of 286 nodules), and 18.2% (eight of 44 nodules), respectively, with significant differences between patterns (P < .001). There was high correlation between classification with TIRADS (r = 1.000, P < .001) and ATA guidelines (r = 0.900, P = 0.037), without statistically significant differences (P = .873).

CONCLUSION

Both TIRADS and the ATA guidelines provide effective malignancy risk stratification for thyroid nodules. Nodules that do not meet the criteria for a specific pattern with the ATA guidelines have a relatively high risk of malignancy (18.2%).

摘要

目的

比较甲状腺结节的恶性风险分层与 2014 年美国甲状腺协会(ATA)管理指南和甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究经机构审查委员会批准。豁免了获得知情同意的要求。从 2013 年 11 月至 2014 年 7 月,纳入了 1241 例患者的 1293 个甲状腺结节(平均年龄 50.8 岁±13.5)。所有结节均至少为 10mm。在超声(US)中,实性、低回声或明显低回声、微分叶状或不规则边缘、微钙化或混合钙化以及非平行形状被认为是可疑特征。每个结节均被分配 TIRADS 类别和 ATA 指南确定的 US 模式。使用 Spearman 秩检验评估 TIRADS 类别或 ATA 模式与恶性率之间的相关性。

结果

在 1293 个甲状腺结节中,1059 个(81.9%)为良性,234 个(18.1%)为恶性。1293 个结节中有 44 个(3.4%)不符合 ATA 模式标准,被归类为“未指定”。TIRADS 类别 3、4a、4b、4c 和 5 结节的恶性率分别为 1.9%(316 个结节中的 6 个)、4.2%(408 个结节中的 17 个)、12.9%(256 个结节中的 33 个)、49.8%(261 个结节中的 130 个)和 92.3%(52 个结节中的 48 个),类别之间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。ATA 指南和未指定模式下恶性风险低、低、中、高度可疑的结节恶性率分别为 2.7%(407 个结节中的 11 个)、3.1%(323 个结节中的 10 个)、16.7%(233 个结节中的 39 个)、58.0%(286 个结节中的 166 个)和 18.2%(44 个结节中的 8 个),模式之间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。TIRADS 分类(r=1.000,P<0.001)和 ATA 指南(r=0.900,P=0.037)之间高度相关,无统计学差异(P=0.873)。

结论

TIRADS 和 ATA 指南均能有效对甲状腺结节的恶性风险进行分层。不符合 ATA 指南特定模式标准的结节恶性风险相对较高(18.2%)。

相似文献

1
Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Comparison between the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and the 2014 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines.甲状腺结节恶性风险分层:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与 2014 年美国甲状腺协会管理指南的比较。
Radiology. 2016 Mar;278(3):917-24. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150056. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
2
Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic results at cytologic examination: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the Bethesda System.甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查结果不明确的甲状腺结节恶性风险分层:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与 Bethesda 系统的联合应用。
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):287-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140359. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
3
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance.超声 K-TIRADS 分类与 2015 年 ATA 指南在甲状腺结节及滤泡性肿瘤良恶性危险分层中的诊断效能
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):444-450. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20961. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Thyroid Nodules: Nondiagnostic Cytologic Results according to Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System before and after Application of the Bethesda System.甲状腺结节:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在贝塞斯达系统前后应用的非诊断性细胞学结果。
Radiology. 2015 Aug;276(2):579-87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15142308. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
5
Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with benign results on cytology: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and Bethesda system.甲状腺结节细胞学检查结果为良性时的恶性风险分层:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与贝塞斯达系统的联合应用
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21(6):1898-903. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3556-2. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
6
ACR TI-RADS and ATA US scores are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.ACR TI-RADS 与 ATA US 评分有助于对具有不确定细胞学特征的甲状腺结节进行管理。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0429-5.
7
Follow-Up Strategies for Thyroid Nodules with Benign Cytology on Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Malignancy Rates of Management Guidelines Using Ultrasound Before and After the Era of the Bethesda System.超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查为良性的甲状腺结节的随访策略:贝塞斯达系统前后时代应用超声甲状腺结节管理指南的恶性肿瘤发生率。
Thyroid. 2019 Sep;29(9):1227-1236. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0769. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
8
Large (≥3cm) thyroid nodules with benign cytology: Can Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) help predict false-negative cytology?细胞学检查为良性的大(≥3cm)甲状腺结节:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)能否有助于预测细胞学假阴性结果?
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0186242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186242. eCollection 2017.
9
Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Categorization Based on Solidity and Echogenicity.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺结节的风险分层:基于实性和回声性的分类
Thyroid. 2016 Apr;26(4):562-72. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0460. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
10
Cytology-Ultrasonography Risk-Stratification Scoring System Based on Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and the Korean-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.基于细针抽吸细胞学和韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的细胞学-超声风险分层评分系统。
Thyroid. 2017 Jul;27(7):953-959. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0603. Epub 2017 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmasking risk in low-suspicion thyroid nodules: clinical and sonographic predictors of malignancy in TIRADS 3, a retrospective single-center study.揭示低可疑性甲状腺结节的风险:一项回顾性单中心研究中TIRADS 3类甲状腺结节恶性的临床及超声预测因素
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-04034-5.
2
Thyroid nodule size and risk of malignancy: a systematic review.甲状腺结节大小与恶性风险:一项系统综述。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):1188. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02588-y.
3
Prospective Validation of Accuracy of American College of Radiologists- Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) in Diagnosing Malignancy in Thyroid Nodule and a Prediction Score (TiPS) for Thyroid Malignancy.
美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR-TIRADS)诊断甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤准确性的前瞻性验证及甲状腺恶性肿瘤预测评分(TiPS)
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Jan-Feb;29(1):101-107. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_324_23. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
Clinicopathological and Radiological Correlation Among the Spectrum of Nodular Thyroid Lesions.甲状腺结节性病变谱的临床病理与影像学相关性
Cureus. 2024 Oct 2;16(10):e70725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70725. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and agreement of TI-RADS scoring in thyroid nodules: A comparative analysis between sonographers and radiologists.评估甲状腺结节 TI-RADS 评分的诊断准确性和一致性:超声医师和放射科医师之间的对比分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 11;19(10):e0312121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312121. eCollection 2024.
6
Challenges in Risk Stratification of Solid Atypical Mixed Echogenicity Thyroid Nodules.实性非典型混合回声甲状腺结节的风险分层挑战
touchREV Endocrinol. 2024 Apr;20(1):58-62. doi: 10.17925/EE.2023.20.1.2. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
7
Comparative analysis of the image quality and diagnostic performance of the zooming technique with diffusion-weighted imaging using different b-values for thyroid papillary carcinomas and benign nodules.甲状腺乳头状癌和良性结节在不同b值下,变焦技术与扩散加权成像的图像质量及诊断性能的对比分析。
Front Oncol. 2024 May 7;14:1241776. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1241776. eCollection 2024.
8
A comprehensive comparative assessment of eight risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules in the elderly population.老年人群甲状腺结节八种风险分层系统的综合比较评估
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 15;13:1265973. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265973. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparison of the C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules.C-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS和ATA指南在甲状腺结节恶性风险分层中的比较。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jul 1;13(7):4514-4525. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-826. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
Diagnosis of thyroid micronodules on ultrasound using a deep convolutional neural network.超声检查中应用深度卷积神经网络诊断甲状腺微小结节。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 4;13(1):7231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34459-3.