• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夹闭还是不夹闭?选择性非夹闭腹腔镜部分肾切除术的长期功能结果。

To clamp or not to clamp? Long-term functional outcomes for elective off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

作者信息

Shah Paras H, George Arvin K, Moreira Daniel M, Alom Manaf, Okhunov Zhamshid, Salami Simpa, Waingankar Nikhil, Schwartz Michael J, Vira Manish A, Richstone Lee, Kavoussi Louis R

机构信息

Department of Urology, Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.

National Cancer Institute - Urologic Oncology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2016 Feb;117(2):293-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13309. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1111/bju.13309
PMID:26348366
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether elective off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) affords long-term renal functional benefit compared with the on-clamp approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent elective LPN between 2006 and 2011. Patients were followed longitudinally for up to 5 years. In all, 315 patients with radiographic evidence of a solitary renal mass and normal-appearing contralateral kidney underwent elective LPN; 209 were performed on-clamp vs 106 off-clamp. One patient who required conversion from LPN to open PN was excluded from the study. Additionally, four patients in the on-clamp cohort who underwent subsequent radical nephrectomy for local-regional recurrence were excluded from longitudinal functional evaluation after their procedure. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between hilar clamping groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with clamp times >30 min and those with baseline renal insufficiency (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m(2) ). Risk of developing worsened or new-onset renal insufficiency was also compared.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative eGFR was similar between the on-clamp and off-clamp cohorts (80.7 vs 84.1 mL/min/1.73m(2) , P > 0.05). Univariable and multivariable analyses did not show significant differences in postoperative eGFR between both groups among all-comers, those with clamp times >30 min, and patients with baseline renal insufficiency. Risk of chronic kidney disease was not diminished by the off-clamp approach with up to 5 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Progressive recovery of renal function after hilar clamping in the elective setting eclipses short-term functional benefit achieved with off-clamp LPN by 6 months; there was no significant difference in eGFR or the percentage incidence of chronic kidney disease between the on-clamp and off-clamp cohorts with up to 5 years follow-up. As such, eliminating transient ischaemia during elective LPN does not confer clinical benefit.

摘要

目的

评估选择性非阻断性腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)与阻断性手术相比是否能带来长期肾功能益处。

患者与方法

这是一项对2006年至2011年间接受选择性LPN患者的回顾性研究。对患者进行长达5年的纵向随访。共有315例有影像学证据显示为孤立性肾肿块且对侧肾脏外观正常的患者接受了选择性LPN;其中209例采用阻断性手术,106例采用非阻断性手术。1例需要从LPN转为开放性肾部分切除术的患者被排除在研究之外。此外,阻断性手术组中4例因局部区域复发而随后接受根治性肾切除术的患者在手术后被排除在纵向功能评估之外。主要目的是评估肾门阻断组之间术后估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的差异。对钳夹时间>30分钟的患者和基线肾功能不全(eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m²)的患者进行亚组分析。还比较了发生肾功能恶化或新发肾功能不全的风险。

结果

阻断性手术组和非阻断性手术组术前平均eGFR相似(80.7 vs 84.1 mL/min/1.73m²,P>0.05)。单因素和多因素分析显示,在所有患者、钳夹时间>30分钟的患者以及基线肾功能不全的患者中,两组术后eGFR均无显著差异。在长达5年的随访中,非阻断性手术方法并未降低慢性肾病的风险。

结论

在选择性手术中,肾门阻断后肾功能的逐步恢复在6个月时超过了非阻断性LPN所带来的短期功能益处;在长达5年的随访中,阻断性手术组和非阻断性手术组的eGFR或慢性肾病的发生率百分比无显著差异。因此,在选择性LPN期间消除短暂性缺血并不能带来临床益处。

相似文献

1
To clamp or not to clamp? Long-term functional outcomes for elective off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.夹闭还是不夹闭?选择性非夹闭腹腔镜部分肾切除术的长期功能结果。
BJU Int. 2016 Feb;117(2):293-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13309. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
2
Perioperative outcomes of off-clamp vs complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.无血夹与完全阻断肾门腹腔镜下部分肾切除术的围手术期结果比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4 Pt B):E235-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11573.x. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
3
Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage.离断与完全阻断控制腹腔镜肾部分切除术:按临床分期比较。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10592.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
4
Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:200例配对患者的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
5
The impact of warm ischaemia on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.热缺血对腹腔镜肾部分切除术后肾功能的影响。
BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(3):377-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05304.x.
6
Nephrometry score-guided off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and short-time functional results.肾计量评分引导下的无阻断腹腔镜肾部分切除术:患者选择及短期功能结果
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 21;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0914-5.
7
Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗临床T1期肾门肿瘤:围手术期特征及短期功能和肿瘤学结局比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1183-1187. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0064. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: oncologic and renal functional outcomes.无阻断腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肾门肿瘤:肿瘤学和肾功能结局。
J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):191-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0440. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
9
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients.腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:340 例患者长期肿瘤学和功能结局评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11280.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
10
Renal function is the same 6 months after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy regardless of clamp technique: analysis of outcomes for off-clamp, selective arterial clamp and main artery clamp techniques, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.机器人辅助部分肾切除术后6个月,无论采用何种钳夹技术,肾功能均相同:对无钳夹、选择性动脉钳夹和主动脉钳夹技术的结果分析,最短随访1年。
BJU Int. 2015 Jun;115(6):921-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12975. Epub 2015 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
HISTOPATHOLOGIC FEATURES OF KIDNEY TUMORS AND COMPARISON OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL AND PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY AT OSIJEK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTER FROM 2017 UNTIL THE END OF 2021.奥西耶克大学医院中心 2017 年至 2021 年底行根治性和部分肾切除术治疗的肾肿瘤的组织病理学特征及患者比较。
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Jul;62(Suppl2):84-94. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s2.12.
2
The Prognostic Impact of the Surgical Margin in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-Center Study.肾部分切除术治疗肾细胞癌时手术切缘的预后影响:一项多中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 9;16(8):1449. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081449.
3
Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Artery Only Versus Artery and Vein Clamping in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
部分肾切除术患者中单纯动脉夹闭与动静脉夹闭的手术及功能结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Turk J Urol. 2022 May;48(3):180-195. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22009.
4
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Off-Clamp Versus on Clamp.腹腔镜部分肾切除术:夹闭与不夹闭。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 May 1;23(5):1719-1723. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.5.1719.
5
Renal function after partial nephrectomy following intra-arterial embolization of renal tumors.肾肿瘤动脉栓塞后部分肾切除术后的肾功能。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 7;10(1):21352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78461-5.
6
Partial laparoscopic nephrectomy: what really matters?部分腹腔镜肾切除术:真正重要的是什么?
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):61-63. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0167.1.
7
Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis.保留肾单位手术中节段性动脉夹闭与主肾动脉夹闭的比较:更新的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 16;18(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01990-w.
8
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without clamping the renal pedicle.腹腔镜下肾部分切除术不夹闭肾蒂。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3027-3036. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07099-w. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review.GU 癌症中的保器官手术:第 1 部分-肾脏和肾上腺肿瘤中的保器官手术:系统评价。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Mar;51(3):377-393. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-02070-5. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
10
Off-clamp partial nephrectomy has a positive impact on short- and long-term renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非阻断性部分肾切除术对短期和长期肾功能有积极影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0993-3.