Rehabil Psychol. 2015 Aug;60(3):231. doi: 10.1037/rep0000053.
Reports an error in "Individual and Dyadic Planning Predicting Pelvic Floor Exercise Among Prostate Cancer Survivors" by Jan Keller, Silke Burkert, Amelie U. Wiedemann, Aleksandra Luszczynska, Mark Schrader and Nina Knoll (Rehabilitation Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Jul 6, 2015, np). Aleksandra Luszczynska's institutional affiliation was incorrectly set as Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities. It should have been University of Social Sciences and Humanities. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2015-30045-001.)
Radical prostatectomy, a standard treatment for localized prostate cancer, is often followed by a recommendation to initiate and maintain pelvic floor exercise (PFE), to control postsurgery urinary incontinence. Previous studies showed that planning facilitated the uptake and maintenance of a new behavior. Whereas individual planning addresses the setting of plans by 1 person, dyadic planning refers to creating plans together with a partner on when, where, and how the individual target person will perform a behavior. Individual and dyadic planning of PFE, their development over time, and their associations with PFE were investigated.
In a correlational study, 175 prostate-cancer patients provided data at 1, 3, 5, and 7 months following the onset of incontinence. Individual planning of PFE by patients and dyadic planning of PFE between patients and their partners, PFE, and incontinence were assessed by patients' self-reports.
Two-level models with repeated assessments nested in individuals revealed stable levels of individual planning of PFE over time in patients with higher incontinence severity, whereas patients with receding incontinence showed decreases. Independent of incontinence severity, a curvilinear increase followed by a decrease of dyadic planning of PFE across time emerged. Sequential associations of both planning strategies with PFE were found. Whereas individual planning was steadily associated with PFE, associations between dyadic planning and PFE were nonsignificant in the beginning, but increased over time.
Findings point to the importance of individual planning for the adoption and maintenance of PFE, with dyadic planning being relevant for PFE maintenance only. (PsycINFO Database Record
报告了 Jan Keller、Silke Burkert、Amelie U. Wiedemann、Aleksandra Luszczynska、Mark Schrader 和 Nina Knoll 在《前列腺癌幸存者的个体和对偶计划预测骨盆底运动》（康复心理学，高级在线出版物，2015 年 7 月 6 日，np）一文中的一个错误。Aleksandra Luszczynska 的机构隶属关系被错误地设置为华沙社会科学与人文学学院。它应该是社会科学与人文大学。本文的所有版本都已更正。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录 2015-30045-001 中。）
根治性前列腺切除术是治疗局限性前列腺癌的标准方法，常建议患者开始并维持骨盆底运动（PEF）以控制术后尿失禁。先前的研究表明，计划有助于新行为的实施和维持。虽然个体计划解决了一个人的计划设置，但对偶计划是指与伴侣一起制定计划，即在何时、何地以及个人目标人将执行行为。本研究调查了 PEF 的个体和对偶计划、它们随时间的发展以及它们与 PEF 的关系。
在一项相关性研究中，175 名前列腺癌患者在出现尿失禁后 1、3、5 和 7 个月提供数据。患者的个体 PEF 计划和患者与其伴侣之间的对偶 PEF 计划、PEF 和失禁由患者的自我报告评估。
在个体嵌套的重复评估的两水平模型中，在失禁严重程度较高的患者中，个体 PEF 计划在时间上显示出稳定的水平，而失禁程度下降的患者则呈下降趋势。独立于失禁严重程度，对偶计划随时间呈现出先增加后减少的曲线。发现两种计划策略与 PEF 的顺序关联。虽然个体计划与 PEF 始终相关，但对偶计划与 PEF 的关联在开始时不显著，但随着时间的推移而增加。
研究结果表明，个体计划对于采用和维持 PEF 非常重要，而对偶计划仅对 PEF 的维持很重要。（心理学信息库记录）
Zotero 插件