Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Sep;73(5):783-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
In this study, we investigated the role of dyadic planning for health-behavior change. Dyadic planning refers to planning health-behavior change together with a partner. We assumed that dyadic planning would affect the implementation of regular pelvic-floor exercise (PFE), with other indicators of social exchange and self-regulation strategies serving as mediators. In a randomized-controlled trial at a German University Medical Center, 112 prostatectomy-patients with partners were randomly assigned to a dyadic PFE-planning condition or one of three active control conditions. Questionnaire data were assessed at multiple time points within six months post-surgery, measuring self-reported dyadic PFE-planning and pelvic-floor exercise as primary outcomes and social exchange (support, control) and a self-regulation strategy (action control) as mediating mechanisms. There were no specific intervention effects with regard to dyadic PFE-planning or pelvic-floor exercise, as two active control groups also showed increases in either of these variables. However, results suggested that patients instructed to plan dyadically still benefited from self-reported dyadic PFE-planning regarding pelvic-floor exercise. Cross-sectionally, received negative control from partners was negatively related with PFE only in control groups and individual action control mediated between self-reported dyadic PFE-planning and PFE for participants instructed to plan PFE dyadically. Longitudinally, action control mediated between self-reported dyadic PFE-planning and pelvic-floor exercise for all groups. Findings provide support for further investigation of dyadic planning in health-behavior change with short-term mediating effects of behavior-specific social exchange and long-term mediating effects of better self-regulation.
在这项研究中,我们调查了对偶计划在健康行为改变中的作用。对偶计划是指与伴侣一起计划健康行为的改变。我们假设对偶计划将影响定期进行骨盆底运动(PFE)的实施,其他社会交换和自我调节策略的指标作为中介。在德国大学医学中心的一项随机对照试验中,112 名前列腺切除术患者与伴侣随机分配到对偶 PFE 计划条件或三个主动对照条件之一。在手术后的六个月内,通过多次时间点评估问卷调查数据,以自我报告的对偶 PFE 计划和骨盆底运动为主要结果,并测量社会交换(支持、控制)和自我调节策略(行动控制)作为中介机制。由于两个主动对照组在这些变量中的任何一个都显示出增加,因此对偶 PFE 计划或骨盆底运动没有特定的干预效果。然而,结果表明,接受对偶计划指导的患者仍然受益于自我报告的对偶 PFE 计划对骨盆底运动的影响。从横截面来看,仅在对照组中,来自伴侣的负面控制与 PFE 呈负相关,而个体行动控制则在自我报告的对偶 PFE 计划与 PFE 之间为接受对偶 PFE 计划指导的参与者进行中介。从纵向来看,对于所有组,行动控制在自我报告的对偶 PFE 计划与骨盆底运动之间进行中介。这些发现为在健康行为改变中进一步研究对偶计划提供了支持,其短期具有行为特异性社会交换的中介作用,长期具有更好的自我调节的中介作用。