Zhang Pengjun, Wang Chuanxin, Cheng Liming, Zhang Peng, Guo Lin, Liu Wanli, Zhang Zhongying, Huang Yanchun, Ou Qishui, Wen Xinyu, Tian Yaping
Core Laboratory of Translational Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, State Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tumour Biol. 2016 Feb;37(2):2183-91. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4037-3. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate HE4, CA125, progesterone (Prog), and estradiol (E2) for differentiating pelvic masses in postmenopausal women and aimed to build a multi-marker model which may improve the diagnostic value. HE4, CA125, Prog, and E2 were detected in 57 benign pelvic masses (BPM) and 92 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. A total of 66.66 % of the BPM and EOC serum samples were used for building the differentiation model, and the remaining 33.33 % of the BPM and EOC serum samples were used for validation of the differentiation model. After comparing by Z score statistics, HE4 + CA125 + E2 model was chosen as the best multi-marker model. In the training group, the area under curve of the HE4 + CA125 + E2 model was 0.97 (0.93, 1.00), sensitivities of the model for distinguishing BPM from EOC, from early EOC, and from advanced EOC were 90.16, 86.21, and 95.65 %; specificities were 92.11, 92.11, and 92.11 %. In the validation group, sensitivities of HE4 + CA125 + E2 model for distinguishing BPM from EOC, from early EOC, and from advanced EOC were 96.77, 100.00, and 87.50 %, specificities were 84.21, 100.00, and 84.21 %. The multi-marker model showed significant improvement when compared to CA125 or HE4, and it might be an effective pelvic mass differentiation method.
本研究旨在评估人附睾蛋白4(HE4)、癌抗原125(CA125)、孕酮(Prog)和雌二醇(E2)在绝经后女性盆腔肿块鉴别诊断中的价值,并构建一个可能提高诊断价值的多标志物模型。对57例盆腔良性肿块(BPM)患者和92例上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者检测了HE4、CA125、Prog和E2。共66.66%的BPM和EOC血清样本用于构建鉴别模型,其余33.33%的BPM和EOC血清样本用于验证鉴别模型。经Z评分统计比较后,选择HE4+CA125+E2模型作为最佳多标志物模型。在训练组中,HE4+CA125+E2模型的曲线下面积为0.97(0.93,1.00),该模型鉴别BPM与EOC、早期EOC和晚期EOC的灵敏度分别为90.16%、86.21%和95.65%;特异度分别为92.11%、92.11%和92.11%。在验证组中,HE4+CA125+E2模型鉴别BPM与EOC、早期EOC和晚期EOC的灵敏度分别为96.77%、100.00%和87.50%,特异度分别为84.21%、100.00%和84.21%。与CA125或HE4相比,该多标志物模型有显著改善,可能是一种有效的盆腔肿块鉴别方法。