Eminler Ahmet Tarik, Ayyildiz Talat, Irak Kader, Kiyici Murat, Gurel Selim, Dolar Enver, Gulten Macit, Nak Selim G
aGastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya bGastroenterology Department, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun cGastroenterology Department, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Dec;27(12):1361-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000468.
Noninvasive tests are primarily used for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. In clinical practice, serum aminotransferase levels, coagulation parameters, and platelet count have been used to predict whether or not a patient has cirrhosis. In addition, several studies have evaluated the accuracy of combinations (or ratios) of these measures. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between five noninvasive models [AST/ALT ratio (AAR), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), Bonacini cirrhosis discriminant score (CDS), age-platelet index (APind), and King's score] and the degree of hepatic fibrosis as determined by biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C.
A total of 380 patients with viral hepatitis (237 with chronic hepatitis B and 143 with chronic hepatitis C) who were seen at our clinic between January 2005 and January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The degree of fibrosis was determined using the Ishak score. Patients with a fibrosis score of 0-2 were considered to have low fibrosis and those with a score between 3 and 6 were considered to have high fibrosis. Five noninvasive models were compared between the groups with low and high fibrosis.
There were statistically significant differences between the hepatitis B and C patients with high and low fibrosis with respect to APind (4.49±2.35 vs. 2.41±1.84; P<0.001 in hepatitis B and 4.83±2.25 vs. 2.92±1.88; P<0.001 in hepatitis C), APRI (1.00±1.17 vs. 0.47±0.39; P<0.001 in hepatitis B and 1.01±1.01 vs. 0.41±0.29; P<0.001 in hepatitis C), CDS (4.53±1.90 vs. 3.58±1.30; P<0.001 in hepatitis B and 4.71±2.03 vs. 3.42±1.49; P<0.05 in hepatitis C), and King's score (24.31±3.14 vs. 7.65±6.70; P<0.001 in hepatitis B and 24.82±2.55 vs. 8.33±7.29; P<0.001 in hepatitis C). There were no significant differences in the AAR between the hepatitis B and C patients with high and low fibrosis (0.78±0.31 vs. 0.74±0.34; P=0.082 in hepatitis B and 0.91±0.40 vs. 0.85±0.27; P=0.25 in hepatitis C). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the APind, APRI, CDS, and King's score in the hepatitis B group were 0.767, 0.710, 0.646, and 0.770, respectively; these values were 0.732, 0.763, 0.677, and 0.783, respectively, in the hepatitis C group.
In conclusion, our data suggest that four of the five noninvasive methods evaluated in this study can be used to predict advanced fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B and C. However, there was no significant relationship between the degree of hepatic fibrosis and the AAR score, indicating that AAR is not useful in estimating the fibrosis stage in hepatitis B and C patients.
非侵入性检测主要用于对慢性肝病患者的肝纤维化进行分期。在临床实践中,血清转氨酶水平、凝血参数和血小板计数已被用于预测患者是否患有肝硬化。此外,多项研究评估了这些指标组合(或比值)的准确性。本研究旨在探讨五种非侵入性模型[天冬氨酸氨基转移酶/丙氨酸氨基转移酶比值(AAR)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数(APRI)、博纳西尼肝硬化判别评分(CDS)、年龄 - 血小板指数(APind)和金斯评分]与经活检确定的慢性乙型和丙型肝炎患者肝纤维化程度之间的关系。
回顾性分析了2005年1月至2011年1月期间在我院就诊的380例病毒性肝炎患者(237例慢性乙型肝炎患者和143例慢性丙型肝炎患者)。使用伊沙克评分确定纤维化程度。纤维化评分为0 - 2分的患者被认为纤维化程度低,评分为3 - 6分的患者被认为纤维化程度高。比较了低纤维化组和高纤维化组之间的五种非侵入性模型。
乙型和丙型肝炎高纤维化和低纤维化患者在APind方面存在统计学显著差异(乙型肝炎中分别为4.49±2.35 vs. 2.41±1.84;P<0.001,丙型肝炎中分别为4.83±2.25 vs. 2.92±1.88;P<0.001),APRI方面(乙型肝炎中分别为1.00±1.17 vs. 0.47±0.39;P<0.001,丙型肝炎中分别为1.01±1.01 vs. 0.41±0.29;P<0.001),CDS方面(乙型肝炎中分别为4.53±1.90 vs. 3.58±1.30;P<0.001,丙型肝炎中分别为4.71±2.03 vs. 3.42±1.49;P<0.05),以及金斯评分方面(乙型肝炎中分别为24.31±3.14 vs. 7.65±6.70;P<0.001,丙型肝炎中分别为24.82±2.55 vs. 8.33±7.29;P<0.001)。乙型和丙型肝炎高纤维化和低纤维化患者在AAR方面无显著差异(乙型肝炎中分别为0.78±0.31 vs. 0.74±0.34;P = 0.082,丙型肝炎中分别为0.91±0.40 vs. 0.85±0.27;P = 0.25)。乙型肝炎组中APind、APRI、CDS和金斯评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.767、0.710、0.646和0.770;丙型肝炎组中这些值分别为0.732、0.763、0.677和0.783。
总之,我们的数据表明,本研究评估的五种非侵入性方法中的四种可用于预测乙型和丙型肝炎患者的晚期纤维化。然而,肝纤维化程度与AAR评分之间无显著关系,表明AAR在估计乙型和丙型肝炎患者的纤维化阶段方面无用。