Plews-Ogan Margaret, May Natalie, Owens Justine, Ardelt Monika, Shapiro Jo, Bell Sigall K
M. Plews-Ogan is associate professor of medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. N. May is associate professor of research, Division of General Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. J. Owens is associate professor of research, Division of General Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. M. Ardelt is associate professor of sociology, Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. J. Shapiro is associate professor of otolaryngology, Division of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. S.K. Bell is assistant professor of medicine, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):233-41. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000886.
Confronting medical error openly is critical to organizational learning, but less is known about what helps individual clinicians learn and adapt positively after making a harmful mistake. Understanding what factors help doctors gain wisdom can inform educational and peer support programs, and may facilitate the development of specific tools to assist doctors after harmful errors occur.
Using "posttraumatic growth" as a model, the authors conducted semistructured interviews (2009-2011) with 61 physicians who had made a serious medical error. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and coded by two study team members (kappa 0.8) using principles of grounded theory and NVivo software. Coders also scored interviewees as wisdom exemplars or nonexemplars based on Ardelt's three-dimensional wisdom model.
Of the 61 physicians interviewed, 33 (54%) were male, and on average, eight years had elapsed since the error. Wisdom exemplars were more likely to report disclosing the error to the patient/family (69%) than nonexemplars (38%); P < .03. Fewer than 10% of all participants reported receiving disclosure training. Investigators identified eight themes reflecting what helped physician wisdom exemplars cope positively: talking about it, disclosure and apology, forgiveness, a moral context, dealing with imperfection, learning/becoming an expert, preventing recurrences/improving teamwork, and helping others/teaching.
The path forged by doctors who coped well with medical error highlights specific ways to help clinicians move through this difficult experience so that they avoid devastating professional outcomes and have the best chance of not just recovery but positive growth.
公开面对医疗差错对于组织学习至关重要,但对于哪些因素有助于个体临床医生在犯下有害错误后积极学习和适应,我们了解得较少。了解哪些因素有助于医生获得智慧可为教育和同伴支持项目提供信息,并可能有助于开发特定工具,以便在有害差错发生后帮助医生。
作者以“创伤后成长”为模型,于2009年至2011年对61名曾犯下严重医疗差错的医生进行了半结构化访谈。访谈进行了录音,由专业人员转录,并由两名研究团队成员(kappa值为0.8)根据扎根理论原则和NVivo软件进行编码。编码人员还根据阿尔德特的三维智慧模型,将受访者评为智慧典范或非典范。
在接受访谈的61名医生中,33名(54%)为男性,自差错发生以来平均过去了8年。智慧典范比非典范更有可能向患者/家属披露差错(69%对38%);P < 0.03。所有参与者中报告接受过披露培训的不到10%。研究人员确定了八个主题,反映了有助于医生智慧典范积极应对的因素:谈论差错、披露与道歉、宽恕、道德背景、应对不完美、学习/成为专家、防止复发/改善团队合作以及帮助他人/教学。
成功应对医疗差错的医生所走过的道路突出了帮助临床医生度过这一艰难经历的具体方法,使他们避免遭受毁灭性的职业后果,不仅有最佳的康复机会,而且有积极成长的机会。