Skaare Dagfinn, Lia Astrid, Hannisdal Anja, Tveten Yngvar, Matuschek Erika, Kahlmeter Gunnar, Kristiansen Bjørn-Erik
Department of Microbiology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
Department of Microbiology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Nov;53(11):3589-95. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01630-15. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
Haemophilus influenzae is a major pathogen, and beta-lactams are first-line drugs. Resistance due to altered penicillin-binding protein 3 (rPBP3) is frequent, and susceptibility testing of such strains is challenging. A collection of 154 beta-lactamase-negative isolates with a large proportion of rPBP3 (67.5%) was used to evaluate and compare Etest (Haemophilus test medium [HTM]) and disk diffusion (EUCAST method) for categorization of susceptibility to aminopenicillins and cefuroxime, using MICs generated with broth (HTM) microdilution and clinical breakpoints from CLSI and EUCAST as the gold standards. In addition, the proficiency of nine disks in screening for the rPBP3 genotype (N526K positive) was evaluated. By Etest, both essential and categorical agreement were generally poor (<70%), with high very major errors (VME) (CLSI, 13.0%; EUCAST, 34.3%) and falsely susceptible rates (FSR) (CLSI, 87.0%; EUCAST, 88.3%) for ampicillin. Ampicillin (2 μg) with adjusted (+2 mm) zone breakpoints was superior to Etest for categorization of susceptibility to ampicillin (agreement, 74.0%; VME, 11.0%; FSR, 28.3%). Conversely, Etest was superior to 30 μg cefuroxime for categorization of susceptibility to cefuroxime (agreement, 57.1% versus 60.4%; VME, 2.6% versus 9.7%; FSR, 7.1% versus 26.8%). Benzylpenicillin (1 unit) (EUCAST screening disk) and cefuroxime (5 μg) identified rPBP3 isolates with highest accuracies (95.5% and 92.2%, respectively). In conclusion, disk screening reliably detects rPBP3 H. influenzae, but false ampicillin susceptibility is frequent with routine methods. We suggest adding a comment recommending high-dose aminopenicillin therapy or the use of other agents for severe infections with screening-positive isolates that are susceptible to aminopenicillins by gradient or disk diffusion.
流感嗜血杆菌是一种主要病原体,β-内酰胺类药物是一线用药。由于青霉素结合蛋白3(rPBP3)改变导致的耐药很常见,对此类菌株进行药敏试验具有挑战性。收集了154株β-内酰胺酶阴性菌株,其中大部分为rPBP3(67.5%),以评估和比较Etest(流感嗜血杆菌测试培养基[HTM])和纸片扩散法(EUCAST方法)对氨基青霉素和头孢呋辛的药敏分类情况,使用肉汤(HTM)微量稀释法产生的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)以及CLSI和EUCAST的临床断点作为金标准。此外,评估了9种纸片对rPBP3基因型(N526K阳性)的筛查效能。通过Etest法,基本一致性和分类一致性普遍较差(<70%),氨苄西林的极高错误率(VME)较高(CLSI为13.0%;EUCAST为34.3%),假敏感率(FSR)也较高(CLSI为87.0%;EUCAST为88.3%)。调整后的(+2 mm)抑菌圈直径断点的2 μg氨苄西林纸片在氨苄西林药敏分类方面优于Etest法(一致性为74.0%;VME为11.0%;FSR为28.3%)。相反,在头孢呋辛药敏分类方面,Etest法优于30 μg头孢呋辛纸片(一致性分别为57.1%对60.4%;VME分别为2.6%对9.7%;FSR分别为7.1%对26.8%)。苄青霉素(1单位)(EUCAST筛查纸片)和头孢呋辛(5 μg)对rPBP3菌株的识别准确率最高(分别为95.5%和92.2%)。总之,纸片筛查能可靠地检测出rPBP3型流感嗜血杆菌,但常规方法中氨苄西林假敏感情况频繁。我们建议添加注释,推荐对通过梯度法或纸片扩散法筛查为阳性且对氨基青霉素敏感的严重感染患者使用高剂量氨基青霉素治疗或使用其他药物。