Suppr超能文献

低β-内酰胺酶阴性氨苄西林耐药流感嗜血杆菌菌株最好通过肉汤微量稀释法检测阿莫西林敏感性来进行检测。

Low beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae strains are best detected by testing amoxicillin susceptibility by the broth microdilution method.

作者信息

García-Cobos Silvia, Campos José, Román Federico, Carrera Cristina, Pérez-Vázquez María, Aracil Belén, Oteo Jesús

机构信息

Antibiotic Laboratory, Bacteriology Service, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jul;52(7):2407-14. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00214-08. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

Abstract

Ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae due to alterations in penicillin-binding proteins (beta-lactamase negative ampicillin resistant [BLNAR]) is acquiring increasing clinical and epidemiological importance. BLNAR strains with low ampicillin MICs (0.5 to 4 microg/ml) represent the majority of this population in Europe and the United States, but separating them from susceptible isolates is challenging. To investigate the best method to identify low-BLNAR strains, we studied the antibiotic susceptibilities of 94 clinical isolates of H. influenzae by microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion: 25 had no resistance mechanisms (gBLNAS), 34 had mutations in the ftsI gene only (gBLNAR), 20 were beta-lactamase producers only (gBLPAR), and 15 showed beta-lactamase production and mutations in the ftsI gene (gBLPACR). By current CLSI breakpoints, most gBLNAR isolates were ampicillin susceptible by microdilution (76.5%) or by Etest (88.2%). Most gBLNAR strains (79.4%) were nonsusceptible to amoxicillin (the most widely used community antibiotic in the United States and Europe) when tested by microdilution. By Etest, 15% of beta-lactamase-positive isolates were nonresistant to ampicillin or amoxicillin. The poorest agreement between Etest and microdilution results was for the gBLPAR isolates (25% for ampicillin, 15% for amoxicillin, and 10% for cefaclor). Low-strength disks of ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid poorly identified low-BLNAR isolates and are not recommended as a screening method. We suggest new amoxicillin breakpoints for BLNAR isolates as follows: susceptible, MIC < or = 0.5 microg/ml (no resistance mechanisms; pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic [PK/PD] data favorable); intermediate, MICs = 1 to 2 microg/ml (resistance mechanisms present but PK/PD data favorable), and resistant, MICs > or = 4 microg/ml (resistance mechanisms present and PK/PD data unfavorable).

摘要

由于青霉素结合蛋白的改变导致的流感嗜血杆菌对氨苄西林耐药(β-内酰胺酶阴性氨苄西林耐药[BLNAR])在临床和流行病学上的重要性日益增加。氨苄西林最低抑菌浓度(MIC)较低(0.5至4微克/毫升)的BLNAR菌株在欧洲和美国占该群体的大多数,但将它们与敏感菌株区分开来具有挑战性。为了研究鉴定低BLNAR菌株的最佳方法,我们通过微量稀释法、Etest法和纸片扩散法研究了94株流感嗜血杆菌临床分离株的抗生素敏感性:25株没有耐药机制(gBLNAS),34株仅在ftsI基因中有突变(gBLNAR),20株仅产β-内酰胺酶(gBLPAR),15株既产β-内酰胺酶又在ftsI基因中有突变(gBLPACR)。按照当前的CLSI断点,大多数gBLNAR分离株通过微量稀释法(76.5%)或Etest法(88.2%)对氨苄西林敏感。通过微量稀释法检测时,大多数gBLNAR菌株(79.4%)对阿莫西林(在美国和欧洲最广泛使用的社区抗生素)不敏感。通过Etest法检测,15%的β-内酰胺酶阳性分离株对氨苄西林或阿莫西林不耐药。Etest法和微量稀释法结果之间一致性最差的是gBLPAR分离株(氨苄西林为25%,阿莫西林为15%,头孢克洛为10%)。低强度的氨苄西林和阿莫西林-克拉维酸纸片对低BLNAR分离株的鉴定效果不佳,不建议作为筛查方法。我们建议针对BLNAR分离株的新的阿莫西林断点如下:敏感,MIC≤0.5微克/毫升(无耐药机制;药代动力学/药效学[PK/PD]数据有利);中介,MIC为1至2微克/毫升(存在耐药机制但PK/PD数据有利),耐药,MIC≥4微克/毫升(存在耐药机制且PK/PD数据不利)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints.设定和修订抗菌药物敏感性断点
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Jul;20(3):391-408, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00047-06.
6
Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus influenzae.流感嗜血杆菌中的抗菌药物耐药性。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Apr;20(2):368-89. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00040-06.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验