Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Institute of Fine Chemicals, East China University of Science & Technology , Shanghai 200237, P. R. China.
Division of Theoretical Chemistry and Biology, School of Biotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology , SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015 Oct 7;7(39):21956-65. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b06610. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
Cyanoacrylic and carboxyl groups have been developed as the most extensively used electron acceptor and anchoring group for the design of sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. In terms of the photoelectric conversion efficiency, each of them has been demonstrated to be superior to the other one in certain cases. Herein, to further understand the effect of these two groups on cell efficiencies, a series of porphyrin sensitizers were designed and synthesized, with the acceptors systematically varied, and the effect of the neighboring ethynylene unit was also investigated. Compared with the sensitizer XW5 which contains a carboxyphenyl anchoring moiety directly linked to the meso-position of the porphyrin framework, the separate introduction of a strongly electron-withdrawing cyanoacrylic acid as the anchoring group or the insertion of an ethynylene unit can achieve broadened light absorption and IPCE response, resulting in higher Jsc and higher efficiency. Thus, compared with the efficiency of 4.77% for XW5, dyes XW1 and XW6 exhibit higher efficiencies of 7.09% and 5.92%, respectively. Simultaneous introduction of the cyanoacrylic acid and the ethynylene units into XW7 can further broaden light absorption and thus further improve the Jsc. However, XW7 exhibits the lowest Voc value, which is not only related to the floppy structure of the cyanoacrylic group but also related to the aggravated dye aggregation effect due to the extended framework. As a result, XW7 exhibits a relatively low efficiency of 5.75%. These results indicate that the combination of the ethynylene and cyanoacrylic groups is an unsuccessful approach. To address this problem, a cyano substituent was introduced to XW8 at the ortho position of the carboxyl group in the carboxyphenyl acceptor. Thus, XW8 exhibits the highest efficiency of 7.59% among these dyes. Further cosensitization of XW8 with XS3 dramatically improved the efficiency to 9.31%.
氰基丙烯酸酯和羧基已被开发为最广泛使用的电子受体和锚定基团,用于设计染料敏化太阳能电池的敏化剂。就光电转换效率而言,在某些情况下,它们各自都被证明优于另一种。在此,为了进一步了解这两个基团对电池效率的影响,设计并合成了一系列卟啉敏化剂,系统地改变了受体,还研究了相邻乙炔基单元的影响。与含有直接连接到卟啉骨架中位的羧苯基锚定部分的敏化剂 XW5 相比,单独引入强吸电子氰基丙烯酸作为锚定基团或插入乙炔基单元可以实现更宽的光吸收和 IPCE 响应,从而获得更高的 Jsc 和效率。因此,与 XW5 的 4.77%的效率相比,染料 XW1 和 XW6 的效率分别提高到 7.09%和 5.92%。同时将氰基丙烯酸和乙炔基单元引入到 XW7 中可以进一步拓宽光吸收,从而进一步提高 Jsc。然而,XW7 表现出最低的 Voc 值,这不仅与氰基丙烯酸酯的柔软结构有关,还与扩展的框架导致的加剧的染料聚集效应有关。因此,XW7 的效率相对较低,为 5.75%。这些结果表明,乙炔基和氰基丙烯酸酯基团的组合是不成功的。为了解决这个问题,在羧基苯受体的羧基的邻位引入了氰基取代基到 XW8 中。因此,XW8 在这些染料中表现出最高的 7.59%的效率。进一步用 XS3 对 XW8 进行共敏化,将效率提高到 9.31%。