Tziomalos Konstantinos, Giampatzis Vasilios, Bouziana Stella D, Spanou Marianna, Kostaki Stavroula, Papadopoulou Maria, Angelopoulou Stella-Maria, Konstantara Filitsa, Savopoulos Christos, Hatzitolios Apostolos I
First Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
First Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Nov;243(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.08.043. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
There are no studies that compared the effects of different intensities of statin treatment on the long-term outcome of patients with recent ischemic stroke. We aimed to evaluate these effects.
We prospectively studied 436 consecutive patients who were discharged after acute ischemic stroke (39.2% males, age 78.6 ± 6.7 years). Statin treatment was categorized in equipotent doses of atorvastatin. One year after discharge, the functional status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Adverse outcome was defined as mRS between 2 and 6. The occurrence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and death was recorded.
Adverse outcome rates were lower in patients treated with atorvastatin 20 mg/day or more potent doses of statins than in patients treated with atorvastatin 10 mg/day (63.5, 38.2 and 48.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). In binary logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of adverse outcome were the mRS at discharge (relative risk (RR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.77-3.07, p < 0.001) whereas more aggressive treatment with statins independently predicted favorable outcome (atorvastatin 20 vs. 10 mg/day, RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.87, p = 0.026; atorvastatin 40 mg/day or more potent dose of statins vs. atorvastatin 10 mg/day, RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.62-4.44, p = NS). The incidence of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality showed a trend for being lower in patients treated with atorvastatin 40-80 mg/day or rosuvastatin 10-40 mg/day than in those treated with less potent doses of statins.
More aggressive statin treatment improves the long-term functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke more than less aggressive treatment.
尚无研究比较不同强度他汀类药物治疗对近期缺血性卒中患者长期预后的影响。我们旨在评估这些影响。
我们前瞻性研究了436例急性缺血性卒中后出院的连续患者(男性占39.2%,年龄78.6±6.7岁)。他汀类药物治疗按阿托伐他汀等效剂量分类。出院一年后,用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估功能状态。不良结局定义为mRS评分为2至6分。记录缺血性卒中、心肌梗死和死亡的发生情况。
接受20mg/天或更高剂量他汀类药物治疗的患者不良结局发生率低于接受10mg/天阿托伐他汀治疗的患者(分别为63.5%、38.2%和48.2%;p = 0.004)。在二元逻辑回归分析中,不良结局的独立预测因素是出院时的mRS(相对风险(RR)2.33,95%置信区间(CI)1.77 - 3.07,p < 0.001),而更积极的他汀类药物治疗独立预测良好结局(阿托伐他汀20mg/天与10mg/天相比,RR 0.30,95%CI 0.11 - 0.87,p = 0.026;阿托伐他汀40mg/天或更高剂量他汀类药物与阿托伐他汀10mg/天相比,RR 1.66,95%CI 0.62 - 4.44,p = 无统计学意义)。心血管事件发生率和全因死亡率显示,接受40 - 80mg/天阿托伐他汀或10 - 40mg/天瑞舒伐他汀治疗的患者有低于接受较低剂量他汀类药物治疗患者的趋势。
更积极的他汀类药物治疗比不太积极的治疗更能改善急性缺血性卒中患者的长期功能结局。