Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, UK ; Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh Mayfield Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JH, UK.
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, UK.
Ecol Evol. 2015 Aug;5(15):3003-22. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1570. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
An increasing number of studies of hybridization in recent years have revealed that complete reproductive isolation between species is frequently not finalized in more or less closely related organisms. Most of these species do, however, seem to retain their phenotypical characteristics despite the implication of gene flow, highlighting the remaining gap in our knowledge of how much of an organism's genome is permeable to gene flow, and which factors promote or prevent hybridization. We used AFLP markers to investigate the genetic composition of three populations involving two interfertile Rhododendron species: two sympatric populations, of which only one contained hybrids, and a further hybrid-dominated population. No fixed differences between the species were found, and only 5.8% of the markers showed some degree of species differentiation. Additionally, 45.5% of highly species-differentiating markers experienced significant transmission distortion in the hybrids, which was most pronounced in F1 hybrids, suggesting that factors conveying incompatibilities are still segregating within the species. Furthermore, the two hybrid populations showed stark contrasting composition of hybrids; one was an asymmetrically backcrossing hybrid swarm, while in the other, backcrosses were absent, thus preventing gene flow.
近年来,越来越多的杂交研究表明,在或多或少密切相关的生物中,物种之间完全的生殖隔离通常并未最终形成。然而,尽管存在基因流动的影响,这些物种中的大多数似乎仍保留其表型特征,这突显了我们对生物体基因组中有多少部分对基因流动具有渗透性以及哪些因素促进或阻止杂交的认识仍存在差距。我们使用 AFLP 标记来研究涉及两个可杂交的 Rhododendron 物种的三个种群的遗传组成:两个同域种群,其中只有一个包含杂种,以及另一个杂种主导的种群。在物种之间未发现固定差异,只有 5.8%的标记显示出一定程度的物种分化。此外,在杂种中,45.5%的高度物种分化标记经历了显著的传递扭曲,在 F1 杂种中最为明显,这表明传递不相容性的因素仍在物种内分离。此外,两个杂种种群表现出明显不同的杂种组成;一个是不对称回交杂种群,而另一个则没有回交,从而阻止了基因流动。